Router: check formatInfix using the infix tree #3163
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To upgrade to scalameta v4.5.1 (which deprecates Type.{And,Or} trees in
favour of regular Type.ApplyInfix trees), we will need to add special
handling of Type.ApplyInfix trees.
For that, checking newlines.afterInfix will need to be done selectively,
based on the tree, hence we need to pass the tree parameter around.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To upgrade to scalameta v4.5.1 (which deprecates Type.{And,Or} trees in favour of regular Type.ApplyInfix trees), we will need to add special handling of Type.ApplyInfix trees.
For that, checking newlines.afterInfix will need to be done selectively, based on the tree, hence we need to pass the tree parameter around.