Improve the documentation of get_mock_object

[charlax]

No description provided.

[j2labs]

If we can push this into the master branch, I will include these doc
changes when I push 1.0.1 later tonight.

Krace, thoughts?

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Charles-Axel Dein notifications@github.com
wrote:

---

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#276
Commit Summary

• Improve the documentation of get_mock_object

File Changes

• M docs/community.rst
  https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276/files#diff-0 (6)
• M docs/development.rst
  https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276/files#diff-1 (24)
• M docs/install.rst
  https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276/files#diff-2 (6)
• M schematics/models.py
  https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276/files#diff-3 (7)

Patch Links:

• https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276.patch
• https://github.com/schematics/schematics/pull/276.diff

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#276.

jms dnns
jmsdnns.com | @jmsdnns https://twitter.com/jmsdnns

[charlax]

You want me to do the PR for the master branch? Or is it ok as is?

[jmsdnns]

It's up to Krace, imo. Or one of the other commiters.

On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Charles-Axel Dein notifications@github.com
wrote:

You want me to do the PR for the master branch? Or is it ok as is?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#276 (comment).

jms dnns
jmsdnns.com | @jmsdnns https://twitter.com/jmsdnns

[kracekumar]

No worries, I updated the other pull.