Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tools: topogen: Fix network argument. Added IPv6 network argument. #4536

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

GioBar00
Copy link
Contributor

The argument -n or --network in topogen.py is ignored when generating a topology, the default network is always used.

There exists no argument for the user to specify a different IPv6 network with respect to the default one.
I have added the argument -n6 or --network-v6 which is the IPv6 version of the --network argument.

I moved for consistency the variables like DEFAULT_NETWORK from net.py to defines.py where the IPv6 network defines are already present.

… default network defines from net.py to defines.py for consistency
@matzf
Copy link
Contributor

matzf commented May 29, 2024

This change is Reviewable

@matzf matzf self-requested a review June 10, 2024 14:41
Copy link
Contributor

@oncilla oncilla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 4 of 4 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @GioBar00 and @matzf)

a discussion (no related file):
Thank you for your contribution.


Copy link
Contributor

@oncilla oncilla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @matzf)

@oncilla oncilla merged commit 9be9885 into scionproto:master Jun 10, 2024
4 checks passed
@GioBar00 GioBar00 deleted the fix-topogen-network branch June 10, 2024 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants