build: Fix undefined libm references. #33
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gentoo-bot
pushed a commit
to gentoo/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2021
Upstream-PR: scottdraves/flam3#33 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/779001 Signed-off-by: orbea <orbea@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
@scottdraves Is this project still active? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When building flam3 with slibtool (https://dev.midipix.org/cross/slibtool) it fails with many references to libm indicating a missing
-lmforlibflam3_la_LIBADD. This happens because it uses-no-undefinedand GNU libtool does not fail because it silently ignores-no-undefined.Additionally I moved the dependencies to
LIBADDwhere they should be and removed the-lmfrom theLDADDvariables where its now redundant.Please see this downstream issue: https://bugs.gentoo.org/779001