Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: upgrade to rustls 0.23 #2299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

feat: upgrade to rustls 0.23 #2299

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

seanmonstar
Copy link
Owner

Smaller version of #2225. This doesn't provide maximum configurability, just updates to the newest. More configuration can be added in new PRs.

There's one piece that perhaps should be included here: instead of always picking the ring backend, we could use default_provider().unwrap_or_else(ring_provider), as was mentioned in #2225.

cc @djc

Copy link
Contributor

@djc djc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense to me. Sorry I haven't been able to respond quickly on the other PR, I'm dealing with an emergency server migration.

@djc
Copy link
Contributor

djc commented Jun 3, 2024

There's one piece that perhaps should be included here: instead of always picking the ring backend, we could use default_provider().unwrap_or_else(ring_provider), as was mentioned in #2225.

This seems like a nice addition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants