Skip to content

seanpm2001/Hey-Google-Stop

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

27 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Read in a different language:

ar عربى zh-t 中國傳統的)en-us fr français de Deutsch ja 日本語 ko-south 韓國語 pl polski ru русский es en español

Translations in languages other than English are machine translated and are not yet accurate. No errors have been fixed yet as of February 17th 2021. Please report translation errors here look for the correct language translation thread. Make sure to backup your correction with sources and guide me, as I don't know languages other than English well (I plan on getting a translator eventually) please cite wiktionary and other sources in your report. Failing to do so will result in a rejection of the correction being published.


Hey Google, stop - why you should stop using the Google search assistant

Google_Assistant_logo.svg

This is an article on why you should stop using the Google search assistant. The search assistant isn't very useful, and does more harm than good.

For inexperienced tech users, you should know that the Google search engine doesn't contain all of the Internets content, it is just a way of accessing it. All sites on the Google search engine can still be accessed with other search engines, sometimes with better performance. Google search also has a problem, where searches redirect you to Google AMP which you should avoid as well


Index

01.0 - Overview

02.0 - Privacy

03.0 - Alternative solutions

04.0 - Censorship

05.0 - Other things to check out

06.0 - Article info

06.0.1 - Software status

07.0 - File history

08.0 - Footer


Overview

Like other Google products, Google Search Assistant has a history of privacy and performance issues. The assistant is basically just Google search, but with speech, and some corny jokes, It is mostly just a gimmick.

General description from Wikipedia: Google_Assistant - Data from Februry 18th 2021 at 5:28:10 pm (PT: Pacific Time)

Google Assistant is an artificial intelligence–powered virtual assistant developed by Google that is primarily available on mobile and smart home devices. Unlike the company's previous virtual assistant, Google Now, the Google Assistant can engage in two-way conversations.

Assistant initially debuted in May 2016 as part of Google's messaging app Allo, and its voice-activated speaker Google Home. After a period of exclusivity on the Pixel and Pixel XL smartphones, it began to be deployed on other Android devices in February 2017, including third-party smartphones and Android Wear (now Wear OS), and was released as a standalone app on the iOS operating system in May 2017. Alongside the announcement of a software development kit in April 2017, the Assistant has been further extended to support a large variety of devices, including cars and third-party smart home appliances. The functionality of the Assistant can also be enhanced by third-party developers.

Users primarily interact with the Google Assistant through natural voice, though keyboard input is also supported. In the same nature and manner as Google Now, the Assistant is able to search the Internet, schedule events and alarms, adjust hardware settings on the user's device, and show information from the user's Google account. Google has also announced that the Assistant will be able to identify objects and gather visual information through the device's camera, and support purchasing products and sending money, as well as identifying songs.

At CES 2018, the first Assistant-powered smart displays (smart speakers with video screens) were announced, with the first one being released in July 2018. In 2020, Google Assistant is already available on more than 1 billion devices. Google Assistant is available in more than 90 countries and in over 30 languages, and is used by more than 500 million users monthly.[5]


Privacy

Google has a very very bad record when it comes to user privacy. (I could go on and on with evidence of this, but it took a long time to find and go through all these articles)

Privacy on Google products is always bad, due to all Google products containing spyware.

No matter what you do, when you are using Google, all of your sensitive personal data is being sent to Google and others. Google has also been spotted going through open programs. For example, from personal experience (on Firefox) with a YouTube tab open that I didn't visit, I watched several videos offline (VLC Media Player) Later when I went to check the recommendations, it was nearly everything that I had watched. There is no doubt they are spying on other programs too.

If you think you have nothing to hide, you are absolutely wrong. This argument has been debunked many times over:

Via Wikipedia

  1. Edward Snowden remarked "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. "When you say, ‘I have nothing to hide,’ you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about this right.’ You’re saying, ‘I don’t have this right, because I’ve got to the point where I have to justify it.’ The way rights work is, the government has to justify its intrusion into your rights."

  2. Daniel J. Solove stated in an article for The Chronicle of Higher Education that he opposes the argument; he stated that a government can leak information about a person and cause damage to that person, or use information about a person to deny access to services even if a person did not actually engage in wrongdoing, and that a government can cause damage to one's personal life through making errors. Solove wrote "When engaged directly, the nothing-to-hide argument can ensnare, for it forces the debate to focus on its narrow understanding of privacy. But when confronted with the plurality of privacy problems implicated by government data collection and use beyond surveillance and disclosure, the nothing-to-hide argument, in the end, has nothing to say."

  3. Adam D. Moore, author of Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations, argued, "it is the view that rights are resistant to cost/benefit or consequentialist sort of arguments. Here we are rejecting the view that privacy interests are the sorts of things that can be traded for security." He also stated that surveillance can disproportionately affect certain groups in society based on appearance, ethnicity, sexuality, and religion.

  4. Bruce Schneier, a computer security expert and cryptographer, expressed opposition, citing Cardinal Richelieu's statement "If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged", referring to how a state government can find aspects in a person's life in order to prosecute or blackmail that individual. Schneier also argued "Too many wrongly characterize the debate as 'security versus privacy.' The real choice is liberty versus control."

  5. Harvey A. Silverglate estimated that the common person, on average, unknowingly commits three felonies a day in the US.

  6. Emilio Mordini, philosopher and psychoanalyst, argued that the "nothing to hide" argument is inherently paradoxical. People do not need to have "something to hide" in order to hide "something". What is hidden is not necessarily relevant, claims Mordini. Instead, he argues an intimate area which can be both hidden and access-restricted is necessary since, psychologically speaking, we become individuals through the discovery that we could hide something to others.

  7. Julian Assange stated "There is no killer answer yet. Jacob Appelbaum (@ioerror) has a clever response, asking people who say this to then hand him their phone unlocked and pull down their pants. My version of that is to say, 'well, if you're so boring then we shouldn't be talking to you, and neither should anyone else', but philosophically, the real answer is this: Mass surveillance is a mass structural change. When society goes bad, it's going to take you with it, even if you are the blandest person on earth."

  8. Ignacio Cofone, law professor, argues that the argument is mistaken in its own terms because, whenever people disclose relevant information to others, they also disclose irrelevant information. This irrelevant information has privacy costs and can lead to other harms, such as discrimination.

Google search assistant is the same as all other Google products, it contains spyware, as Google is not just a search company, they are a user data company, and you are the product. To Google, you are only worth about $700.00 (unless you are making them ad revenue)

The Google assistant is bundled with Google devices (such as the Android and ChromeOS operating systems) and is always listening and recording what you say around your device (like all other Google products)


Alternative solutions

Currently, there are no known privacy focused search assistants. A search assistant isn't needed, it is just for people who are lazy or don't want to use a keyboard (line is subject of removal). You can get the same effect (without the corny jokes) by using text-to-speech with your search engine.

  • Amazon Alexa (listens to you at all times, and has similar privacy issues)

  • Siri (Apple) (only for Apple products (iOS, iPadOS, WatchOS, TvOS, MacOS) but may have more privacy than all the others)

  • Cortana (Microsoft) (problematic, and has privacy issues)


Censorship

Google search is a censored search engine. Google filters out results it doesn't agree with, so searches are biased.


Other things to check out

The Google Graveyard (killedbygoogle.com) - a sorted list of the 224+ products Google has killed

GitHub link

Alphabet worker union - The new workers union at Google with over 800 members

Don't want to part with the dinosaur easter egg? This website has you covered

There are other alternates, just search for them.


Some fact checking is needed for this article


Article info

File type: Markdown (*.md)

File version: 1 (Thursday, February 18th 2021 at 5:37 pm)

Line count (including blank lines and compiler line): 197

Software status

All of my works are free from restrictions. DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) is not present in any of my works. This project does not contain any DRM

DRM-free_label.en.svg

This sticker is supported by the Free Software Foundation. I never intend to include DRM in my works.

File history

Version 1 (Thursday, February 18th 2021 at 5:37 pm)

Changes:

  • Started the file/article
  • Added the title section
  • Referenced the Google icon, and the Chrome popup gif
  • Added a section about privacy
  • Added a section about the overview
  • Added the article info section
  • Referenced the DRM Free icon
  • Added the file history section
  • Added the alternative solutions section
  • Added the censorship section
  • Added the other things to check out section
  • Added the index
  • Added the footer
  • No other changes in version 1

Version 2 (Coming soon)

Changes:

  • Coming soon
  • No other changes in version 2

Footer

You have reached the end of this file!

EOF