Prepare release

* When I created the 6.0.2 tag, I only ran the tests locally without code coverage
* When I pushed the 6.0.2 tag, the CI pipeline failed
* Upon seeing the CI pipeline, I deleted the 6.0.2 tag (within seconds after pushing it). I also deleted the 6.0.2 release on packagist.org
* As it turned out, the CI pipeline only failed because of bad code coverage metadata (after d0d99db)
* In hindsight, pulling the release was an overreaction that should have been avoided

ChangeLog.md

@@ -2,7 +2,13 @@
 
 All notable changes are documented in this file using the [Keep a CHANGELOG](https://keepachangelog.com/) principles.
 
-## [6.0.2] - 2024-06-17
+## [6.0.3] - 2024-06-17
+
+### Fixed
+
+* Fixed code coverage metadata
+
+## [6.0.2] - 2024-06-17 [YANKED]
 
 ### Changed
 
@@ -118,7 +124,8 @@ All notable changes are documented in this file using the [Keep a CHANGELOG](htt
 
 * Remove HHVM-specific code that is no longer needed
 
-[6.0.2]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/6.0.1...6.0.2
+[6.0.3]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/fe0dca49a60d34440e2f086951952dd13aa9a5d2...6.0.3
+[6.0.2]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/6.0.1...fe0dca49a60d34440e2f086951952dd13aa9a5d2
 [6.0.1]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/6.0.0...6.0.1
 [6.0.0]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/5.1...6.0.0
 [5.1.2]: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/exporter/compare/5.1.1...5.1.2