Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sketch processes #6

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

sketch processes #6

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

vincentsarago
Copy link
Collaborator

@vincentsarago vincentsarago commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR does:

  • remove pgstac support
  • add simple processes
  • refactor internals


jobs:
tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
python-version: ['3.8', '3.9', '3.10', '3.11', '3.12']
python-version: ['3.9', '3.10', '3.11'] #, '3.12'
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -0,0 +1,282 @@
"""Process.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not quite sure we can keep this because of the License and because I'm not 💯 sure what the code actually do. Maybe we can rewrite it

collection_id: str,
spatial_extent: Optional[BoundingBox] = None,
temporal_extent: Optional[TemporalInterval] = None,
properties: Optional[dict] = None,
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO:

the properties is defined as a process https://github.com/Open-EO/openeo-processes/blob/master/load_collection.json#L181-L219

I think we shouldn't support this but replace it with more advances STAC API queries

@vincentsarago vincentsarago marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 10:43
@vincentsarago vincentsarago merged commit 018a415 into main Dec 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@vincentsarago vincentsarago deleted the processes branch December 16, 2024 08:49

END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Copyright 2013-2018 Docker, Inc.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably a leftover, I doubt Docker is the copyright holder.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants