Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove usage of unstable features #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023
Merged

Remove usage of unstable features #332

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

mrobinson
Copy link
Member

Use static_assertions::assert_not_impl_any to assert that OsIpcSender
doesn't implement Sync instead of relying on unstable rustc features.
This also makes it clearer what this code does.

Use `static_assertions::assert_not_impl_any` to assert that OsIpcSender
doesn't implement Sync instead of relying on unstable rustc features.
This also makes it clearer what this code does.
@jdm jdm added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 15, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7741ad6 Nov 15, 2023
mrobinson added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Use `static_assertions::assert_not_impl_any` to assert that OsIpcSender
doesn't implement Sync instead of relying on unstable rustc features.
This also makes it clearer what this code does.
mrobinson added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Use `static_assertions::assert_not_impl_any` to assert that OsIpcSender
doesn't implement Sync instead of relying on unstable rustc features.
This also makes it clearer what this code does.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2023
Use `static_assertions::assert_not_impl_any` to assert that OsIpcSender
doesn't implement Sync instead of relying on unstable rustc features.
This also makes it clearer what this code does.
@mrobinson mrobinson deleted the remove-unstable branch April 24, 2024 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants