Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove VecLike #165

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

KamilaBorowska
Copy link
Contributor

@KamilaBorowska KamilaBorowska commented Oct 4, 2019

This is a backwards incompatible change (should be applied for 0.7.0 or something). VecLike was deprecated in 0.6.0 released 2 years ago, and that should have given plenty of time to remove its usages.


This change is Reviewable

This is a backwards incompatible change. VecLike was
deprecated in 0.6.0 released 2 years ago, and that should
have given plenty of time to remove its usages.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #167) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

emilio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2019
This is a backwards incompatible change. VecLike was
deprecated in 0.6.0 released 2 years ago, and that should
have given plenty of time to remove its usages.
@emilio emilio mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2019
dpc pushed a commit to dpc/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2019
This is a backwards incompatible change. VecLike was
deprecated in 0.6.0 released 2 years ago, and that should
have given plenty of time to remove its usages.
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2019
* [breaking change] Use `MaybeUninit` internally to avoid possible undefined behavior (servo#162, servo#170).
* [breaking change] The `drain` method now takes a range argument, just like the standard `Vec::drain` (servo#145).
* [breaking change] Remove the `unreachable` function and replace it with the new standard `unreachable_unchecked` function (servo#164).
* [breaking change] Use `no_std` by default. This crate depends only on `core` and `alloc` by default. If the optional `write` feature is enabled then it depends on `std` so that `SmallVec<[u8, _]>` can implement the `std::io::Write` trait (servo#173).
* Add support for 96-element small vectors, `SmallVec<[T; 96]>` (servo#163).
* Iterators now implement `FusedIterator` (servo#172).
* Indexing now uses the standard `SliceIndex` trait (servo#166).
* Remove the deprecated `VecLike` trait (servo#165).
* Use `NonNull` internally (servo#171).
* Add automatic fuzz testing and MIRI testing (servo#168, servo#162).
* Update syntax and formatting to Rust 2018 standard (servo#174, servo#167).
@mbrubeck mbrubeck mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2019
bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2019
Version 1.0.0

* Requires Rust 1.36 or later.
* [breaking change] Use `MaybeUninit` to avoid possible undefined behavior (#162, #170).
* [breaking change] The `drain` method now takes a range argument, just like the standard `Vec::drain` (#145).
* [breaking change] Remove the `unreachable` function and replace it with the new standard `unreachable_unchecked` function (#164).
* [breaking change] Use `no_std` by default. This crate depends only on `core` and `alloc` by default. If the optional `write` feature is enabled then it depends on `std` so that `SmallVec<[u8;_]>` can implement the `std::io::Write` trait (#173).
* Add support for 96-element small vectors, `SmallVec<[T; 96]>` (#163).
* Iterators now implement `FusedIterator` (#172).
* Indexing now uses the standard `SliceIndex` trait (#166).
* Remove the deprecated `VecLike` trait (#165).
* Use `NonNull` internally (#171).
* Add automatic fuzz testing and MIRI testing (#168, #162).
* Update syntax and formatting to Rust 2018 standard (#174, #167).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants