Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[c++,r,python] Move nanoarrow to src/external #2383

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

eddelbuettel
Copy link
Contributor

closes #2362

Issue and/or context:

As described in #2362 the initial location of the three vendored nanoarrow files was just a first, placing them into src/external is better (and the upcoming version 0.5.0 of nanoarrow should allow it also (more easily) an external cmake project.

Changes:

The files have been moved, restored to their pristine release 0.4.0 form (undoing our formatting), and include and config locations have been adjusted.

Notes for Reviewer:

There may be smoother ways to do this, I would be more than happy to accommodate change requests from anybody deeper into CMake and Python than I am.

SC 44473

Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #44473: [c++] Mnve nanoarrow to external.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #2383 (a700a7f) into main (29294e1) will decrease coverage by 0.69%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2383      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.04%   65.36%   -0.69%     
==========================================
  Files         144      144              
  Lines       13000    12998       -2     
  Branches      511      509       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         8586     8496      -90     
- Misses       4314     4414     +100     
+ Partials      100       88      -12     
Flag Coverage Δ
libtiledbsoma 36.75% <ø> (-2.13%) ⬇️
python 90.61% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
r 71.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
python_api 90.61% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
libtiledbsoma 44.65% <ø> (+24.94%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@nguyenv nguyenv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel merged commit d2b15c2 into main Apr 5, 2024
31 checks passed
@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel deleted the de/sc-44473/move_nanoarrow branch April 5, 2024 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[c++] Revisit nanoarrow code locations including vendoring (follow-up)
2 participants