Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interface changing from being implemented directly to indirectly should not be flagged as deleted #119

Closed
gunnarmorling opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@gunnarmorling
Copy link

Thanks for this nice tool! The generated report is very useful, I noticed one issue only.

Let this be my hierarchy in the previous release:

interface SomeInterface {}

class SomeClass implements SomeInterface {}

And that's my hierarchy in the new release:

interface SomeInterface {}

interface AnotherInterface extends SomeInterface {}

class SomeClass implements AnotherInterface {}

Then the report will incorrectly state that SomeInterface has been removed from the set of interfaces implemented by SomeClass.

siom79 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2016
@siom79
Copy link
Owner

siom79 commented Mar 14, 2016

Fixed on develop branch.

@siom79 siom79 closed this as completed Mar 14, 2016
@gunnarmorling
Copy link
Author

Thanks, that was quick. Appreciated very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants