Prefix binding #415
Closed
Prefix binding #415
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rocketraman
force-pushed
the
rg/prefix-binding
branch
5 times, most recently
from
d196ce4 to
8974098
Compare
rocketraman
force-pushed
the
rg/prefix-binding
branch
from
6d242fd to
4ddb092
Compare
rocketraman
force-pushed
the
rg/prefix-binding
branch
from
4ddb092 to
a269ae5
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Modify
ConfigLoaderandConfigParserso that the config is parsed only a single time.ConfigLoader.configBinder()can now be called to obtain the instance of a new classConfigBinder, which can in turn be used to bind the already parsed config to multiple data classes, given a prefix.This follows the general approach as suggested by @cloudshiftchris.
This PR is stacked on top of #414 and will be rebased and moved out of draft once that PR is merged.Replaced by PR #422.