[core] Invalid member access expressions

[bagipro]

Hey!

APK: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1itnzM0TmVY22OFebbD9VHxbpOZ_otZ4k/view?usp=sharing

There are a lot of such issues, but an example is in class androidx.compose.animation.C0427am

    final androidx.compose.animation.core.C0473ba<androidx.compose.animation.EnterExitState>.androidx/compose/animation/core/bb f1744a;

[jpstotz]

@bagipro For reproducibility it would better you would add the original class name(s), not the class names generated by deobfuscation as those names seem to be not deterministic so it is difficult to reproduce the state shown in the screen shot.

I am also not sure what you want to point out. Are you referring to the .androidx/compose/animation/core/bb part included in the class name?

[skylot]

Are you referring to the .androidx/compose/animation/core/bb part included in the class name?

@jpstotz it is definitely this :)

ba<EnterExitState>.androidx/compose/animation/core/bb

Looks like originally bb class was inner class for ba and use that generic variable from ba.
So jadx needs to detect such signatures and move bb into ba class.

[skylot]

@bagipro fixed, please check

[bagipro]

Hey @skylot, sorry for the long response.

I don't think that it's fixed completely. Example in class androidx.compose.animation.core.TransitionKt$createDeferredAnimation$1:

            androidx.compose.animation.core.C0473ba<S>.androidx.compose.animation.core.C0473ba.C0474bb<T, V>.C0475bc<T, V> bcVar = deferredAnimation.f1886a;

the generated name is incorrect androidx.compose.animation.core.C0473ba<S>.androidx.compose.animation.core.C0473ba.C0474bb

Should I reopen the issue?

[skylot]

@bagipro sorry, forget to check with full names (with disabled use imports) 😞
Please check latest commit 😁

[bagipro]

@skylot
Thanks! Yes, that's fixed