You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The numeric.T.eig function, as implemented in 610f250, looks suspicious: either it's an instance method, then it belongs into numeric.T.prototype.eig. But in that case I don't understand its semantics, since you can't reasonably compute eigenvalues of a single complex number. Or it's a class method, then it should not refer to this. And to make sense semantically, it should probably also take a complex-valued matrix as an argument. I see noone using this function at all, so unless there is actually a use case for this, you might also consider deleting it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gagern
added a commit
to CindyJS/CindyJS
that referenced
this issue
Sep 8, 2015
This function looks in part like a class (i.e. static method), and in part
like an instance method, but neither makes too much sense as it stands.
Reported upstream as sloisel/numeric#61
Will disable the method for now, since it is unusable in its current form.
Disabling it gets rid of a bunch of closure compiler warnings.
montaga
pushed a commit
to montaga/CindyJS
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2015
This function looks in part like a class (i.e. static method), and in part
like an instance method, but neither makes too much sense as it stands.
Reported upstream as sloisel/numeric#61
Will disable the method for now, since it is unusable in its current form.
Disabling it gets rid of a bunch of closure compiler warnings.
The
numeric.T.eig
function, as implemented in 610f250, looks suspicious: either it's an instance method, then it belongs intonumeric.T.prototype.eig
. But in that case I don't understand its semantics, since you can't reasonably compute eigenvalues of a single complex number. Or it's a class method, then it should not refer tothis
. And to make sense semantically, it should probably also take a complex-valued matrix as an argument. I see noone using this function at all, so unless there is actually a use case for this, you might also consider deleting it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: