-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use provenance-repository input for slsa-verifier #300
feat: use provenance-repository input for slsa-verifier #300
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@laurentsimon We only test the container builder verification at |
Signed-off-by: saisatishkarra <saisatish.karra@konghq.com>
@ianlewis will the above scenario not be handled by: https://github.com/slsa-framework/example-package/compare/main...saisatishkarra:refactor/provenance-repository?expand=1#diff-ec5943f44574c4151b994e3164f5cfc4fc5a7cbdce50cceea731f7ca126c6bb9R356-R358 ? |
We have code that tests using various versions of I think we probably need to test at previous versions because it is a Because we only use |
I think we should be able to update this line in a follow-up PR https://github.com/slsa-framework/example-package/blob/main/.github/workflows/scripts/e2e.container.default.verify.sh#L50 Created #300 for tracking |
Thank you @saisatishkarra ! |
@laurentsimon Does changing the workflow file name also require the 3 fields Error. What does that mean/expected? |
good point. You're right, we're using the workflow path to validate the content of the provenance. I've made the changes and re-launched a workflow run |
refers: slsa-framework/slsa-verifier#724 and slsa-framework/slsa-github-generator#3099.
Deprecate exporting COSIGN_REPOSITORY for slsa-verifier during container provenance verification when the --provenance-repository is specified.