Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boost 1.63.0 interprocess patch #204

Closed
smanders opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

boost 1.63.0 interprocess patch #204

smanders opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@smanders
Copy link
Owner

as mentioned in "update the boost version" issue #198 (comment) - there is a boost interprocess bug that requires a patch for boost 1.63.0 (the issue has been fixed in boost 1.67.0)

a patch is provided in the boost ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/11480 which externpro will apply on top of the 1.63.0 tag

@smanders smanders added the bug label Jul 30, 2018
@smanders smanders added this to the current milestone Jul 30, 2018
@smanders smanders self-assigned this Jul 30, 2018
@smanders smanders mentioned this issue Jul 30, 2018
53 tasks
smanders pushed a commit to externpro-archive/interprocess that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2018
smanders pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2018
@smanders
Copy link
Owner Author

completed with commit to boost interprocess repo (to create patch) and externpro dev branch referenced above

@smanders
Copy link
Owner Author

From: Steven Woolsey
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 9:56 AM
To: Scott M Anderson
Subject: boost interprocess patch

Scott,

Here is the information about the boost interprocess problem I talked to you about this morning.

The ticket is https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/11480 and the attachment is between comment 1 and comment 2.

Here is the direct link to the attachment. https://svn.boost.org/trac10/attachment/ticket/11480/win32_api.hpp.patch

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

Thanks,
Steve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant