Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VRF Custom release on top of 2.9 #12070

Conversation

jinhoonbang
Copy link
Contributor

@jinhoonbang jinhoonbang commented Feb 16, 2024

cherry-picking 2 changes on top of 2.9

jinhoonbang and others added 2 commits February 16, 2024 09:27
* make billing more flexible in VRF 2.5
	- percentage based billing
	- flat fee denominated in native

* fix linting issues

* address comments and fix failing tests

* run goimports

* fix linting issue
* allow 0 confirmation delays in VRF; use pending block for simulation in VRF

* fix script build error

* fix failing automation test

* fix more tests

* integraiton test wip

* add integration tests for pending simulation block and zero confirmation delay (only v2 plus) and add simulation block option to superscript

* Update core/chains/evm/client/simulated_backend_client.go

Co-authored-by: Chris Cushman <104409744+vreff@users.noreply.github.com>

* use pendingContractCall instead of low-level call contract

* fix eth_call_test.go

* handle nil gas and gasPrice in backend test client for estimateGas

---------

Co-authored-by: Ilja Pavlovs <ilja.pavlovs@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Chris Cushman <104409744+vreff@users.noreply.github.com>
@jinhoonbang jinhoonbang changed the title move the error to after confirming it is intended to use mercury (#11897 VRF Custom release on top of 2.9 Feb 16, 2024
@jinhoonbang jinhoonbang changed the base branch from develop to re-2297/release-2.9.1-vrf-20240216 February 16, 2024 20:15
@jinhoonbang jinhoonbang marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2024 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant