Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KS-198: Workflow Spec Approval #13181
KS-198: Workflow Spec Approval #13181
Changes from all commits
a79b790
660b396
137ed53
6de1a65
6016360
a84bc42
03d1da3
94e7709
9d994ac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like there's a lot of duplication around validating specs. I guess it's necessary for each function individually but it appears like it's getting called up to 4 times. Not a big deal but maybe we can refactor and consolidate a bit later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just want to highlight that without this being implemented, what this means is, if the job has always been managed through CLO then it won't be applicable, as the externalJobID should be able to find the existing job. However if the workflow was added outside CLO then that job needs to be manually removed first. If workflow specs are not being manually added by nops then technically the latter should also not be a problem. However, if we do hide the workflow job from the UI it would also mean that they can't remove the job either.
I don't think it's a problem for now but perhaps we should revisit so it's full proof. The query here is usually through a unique identifier that ties the job to the spec.