Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eliminate delta score option #2338

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

trishorts
Copy link
Contributor

There is a relatively unknown scoring option in MetaMorpheus that was created by one of our grad students some number of years ago. I don't believe that it is really ever used and it is causing me some headaches in the computation of q-value.

This PR eliminates that feature.

image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (20da6fc) 92.67% compared to head (17b22c1) 92.63%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2338      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.67%   92.63%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         136      136              
  Lines       21321    21302      -19     
  Branches     2930     2924       -6     
==========================================
- Hits        19760    19733      -27     
- Misses       1081     1095      +14     
+ Partials      480      474       -6     
Files Coverage Δ
MetaMorpheus/EngineLayer/CommonParameters.cs 95.05% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
...pheus/EngineLayer/FdrAnalysis/FdrAnalysisEngine.cs 91.38% <100.00%> (-4.13%) ⬇️
MetaMorpheus/TaskLayer/MetaMorpheusTask.cs 87.28% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

@trishorts trishorts merged commit 15627fc into smith-chem-wisc:master Feb 2, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants