Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create product dto infra #40

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 3, 2024
Merged

Create product dto infra #40

merged 4 commits into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

italopessoa
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates revolve around integrating the ProductDto class into the ByteMeBurger project's infrastructure layer. Changes involve using ProductDto for data management in repository operations and tests, enhancing async methods, and refining SQL queries to match the new data structure. These adjustments aim to streamline data transfer and enhance maintainability.

Changes

Files Summary
.../Dto/ProductDto.cs Defines ProductDto with properties and conversion operators for managing product data.
.../Repository/ProductRepositoryDapper.cs Updated to use ProductDto for improved data handling, async operations, and SQL queries.
.../Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs Test cases adjusted to incorporate ProductDto, refining parameters and SQL queries.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22630db and 110d839.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (4 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (no review received)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (1)

Pattern **/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2


public DateTime? LastUpdate { get; set; }

public ProductDto()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Properties Name, Description, and Images are non-nullable but are not initialized in the constructor, which could lead to null reference exceptions. Consider initializing these properties with default values or making them nullable.

- public string Name { get; set; }
- public string Description { get; set; }
- public string Images { get; set; }
+ public string? Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;
+ public string? Description { get; set; } = string.Empty;
+ public string? Images { get; set; } = string.Empty;

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
public ProductDto()
public ProductDto()
public string? Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public string? Description { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public string? Images { get; set; } = string.Empty;

{
}

public static implicit operator Product(ProductDto? dto) => ToDomain(dto);
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot May 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a potential issue with the implicit conversion operator where a null ProductDto could lead to a null reference exception when calling ToDomain. Consider adding a null check in the ToDomain method.

- public static implicit operator Product(ProductDto? dto) => ToDomain(dto);
+ public static implicit operator Product?(ProductDto? dto) => dto is null ? null : ToDomain(dto);

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
public static implicit operator Product(ProductDto? dto) => ToDomain(dto);
public static implicit operator Product?(ProductDto? dto) => dto is null ? null : ToDomain(dto);

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe I'll fix it later, maybe not. thanks

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@italopessoa, understood! If you decide to address this issue later and need any assistance, feel free to reach out. Meanwhile, if you think it's beneficial, I can help you open a GitHub issue to track this for a future update. Just let me know! 😊

@italopessoa italopessoa merged commit 71489b7 into main May 3, 2024

namespace FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Dto;

internal class ProductDto
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai on this file, I set it as internal, but I forgot to config the project to allow it to be visible for other projects, please keep an eye on it next time.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@italopessoa Thank you for pointing out the visibility issue with the ProductDto class. I'll make sure to keep an eye on access modifiers and project configurations in future reviews to help prevent similar oversights. If there's anything specific you'd like to adjust or further review in this PR, please let me know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant