Refactor add checkout #56
Conversation
- refactor to support fake checkout - refactor models - remove some items from coverage - added more domain exceptions
WalkthroughThe recent updates aim to enhance the functionality and architecture of the ByteMeBurger application. Changes include introducing new API endpoints, adjusting container configurations, and refining order and product management logic. The removal of a project and various code refactoring steps are geared towards improving system efficiency, maintainability, and overall operations. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1)
8-8: Consider adding a more detailed justification for excluding theFakeCheckoutOrderUseCasefrom code coverage to clarify the decision for future maintainers.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs (1)
Line range hint
177-196: The testOrder_ValidOrderchecks multiple stages of the order process. However, there are potential issues with nullable value types that may be null, as indicated by static analysis.- doneDate.Should().BeAfter(preparingDate.Value); - finishedDate.Should().BeAfter(doneDate.Value); + doneDate?.Should().BeAfter(preparingDate.Value); + finishedDate?.Should().BeAfter(doneDate.Value);
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (43)
- FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.sln (4 hunks)
- FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (3 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/OrdersController.cs (4 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainExceptionFilter.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/CheckoutOrderCommandDto.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/CreateCustomerCommand.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Program.cs (4 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/OrderService.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICreateOrderUseCase.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCase.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/DomainException.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/EntityNotFoundException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/UseCaseException.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Order.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/DomainEventTrigger.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/OrderStatusChanged.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Ingoing/IOrderService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Outgoing/IOrderRepository.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/OrderStatus.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/ProductCategory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/InMemoryOrderRepository.cs (1 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (9 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/ProductsControllerTest.cs (4 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/OrderServiceTest.cs (7 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs (3 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs (7 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCaseTest.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/FindProductsByCategoryUseCaseTest.cs (1 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/UpdateProductUseCaseTest.cs (3 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs (9 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/ProductTest.cs (3 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapperTest.cs (2 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.csproj
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/CreateCustomerCommand.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.csproj
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/EntityNotFoundException.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/ProductCategory.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/ProductsControllerTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/UpdateProductUseCaseTest.cs
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (1)
README.md (1)
Near line 9: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing
Context: ...an find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/...
GitHub Check Runs (1)
build success (11)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs: [warning] 38-38:
Dereference of a possibly null reference.
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs: [warning] 193-193:
Nullable value type may be null.
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs: [warning] 195-195:
Nullable value type may be null.
Path-based Instructions (32)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/OrderStatus.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/CheckoutOrderCommandDto.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICreateOrderUseCase.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/OrderStatusChanged.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Outgoing/IOrderRepository.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/UseCaseException.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCase.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCaseTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/DomainException.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/InMemoryOrderRepository.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Ingoing/IOrderService.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/OrderService.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainExceptionFilter.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/FindProductsByCategoryUseCaseTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/DomainEventTrigger.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/ProductTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapperTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/OrdersController.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Program.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Order.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/OrderServiceTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.
Additional comments not posted (54)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1)
7-8: Simplified method signature aligns well with refactoring objectives.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/ValueObjects/OrderStatus.cs (1)
9-14: Enum values are comprehensive and well-defined, supporting accurate order lifecycle tracking.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Model/CheckoutOrderCommandDto.cs (1)
10-10: Proper use ofRequiredattribute ensures necessary data is provided for order operations.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/ICreateOrderUseCase.cs (1)
8-8: Method signature is clear and aligns well with domain logic, allowing flexibility with nullable CPF.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/OrderStatusChanged.cs (1)
9-10: Constructor efficiently encapsulates necessary data for the event, aligning well with domain-driven design principles.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Outgoing/IOrderRepository.cs (1)
14-15: Addition ofUpdateOrderStatusAsyncenhances repository capabilities and aligns with modern asynchronous programming practices.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/UseCaseException.cs (1)
5-5: Appropriate use of[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]for exceptions, acknowledging practical limits of test coverage.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCase.cs (1)
12-13: Appropriately triggers domain event upon successful product deletion, aligning with domain-driven design principles.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/DeleteProductUseCaseTest.cs (1)
8-21: The unit test methodDeleteProduct_ShouldCallRepositoryDeleteis well-structured and effectively verifies the expected behavior of theDeleteProductUseCase.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Base/DomainException.cs (1)
5-5: The addition of the[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]attribute to theDomainExceptionclass is appropriate, as it helps maintain focus on more critical parts of the codebase for testing.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Ports/Ingoing/IOrderService.cs (1)
30-35: The addition of theCheckoutAsyncmethod to theIOrderServiceinterface is well-documented and aligns with the refactoring goals of the PR.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/OrderService.cs (2)
10-13: The updated constructor of theOrderServiceclass correctly injects the necessary use cases for order management.
31-34: The implementation of theCheckoutAsyncmethod inOrderServiceis concise and correctly delegates the operation to thecheckoutOrderUseCase.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase.cs (1)
18-36: The implementation of theFakeCheckoutOrderUseCaseeffectively simulates the checkout process and handles exceptions appropriately.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainExceptionFilter.cs (1)
24-41: The updates toDomainExceptionFilterto handleEntityNotFoundExceptionwith a 404 status and other domain exceptions with a 400 status are well-implemented and improve the API's error handling.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/FindProductsByCategoryUseCaseTest.cs (1)
18-18: The testFindByCategory_NotFoundcorrectly handles the scenario where no products are found, ensuring that the result is appropriately empty.docker-compose.yml (2)
5-5: Ensure the container name aligns with naming conventions and deployment configurations.
57-57: Ensure the network driver is appropriate for your deployment environment.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Events/DomainEventTrigger.cs (4)
21-23: Ensure that theOrderCreatedevent handler properly handles null values for the order parameter.
26-28: Ensure that theProductDeletedevent handler properly handles null values for the productId parameter.
36-38: Ensure that theOrderStatusChangedevent handler properly handles null values for the orderId, oldStatus, and newStatus parameters.
41-43: Ensure that theOrderPaymentConfirmedevent handler properly handles null values for the order parameter.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs (1)
41-42: Ensure that theOrderCreatedevent is raised only after the order is successfully created in the repository.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/ProductTest.cs (3)
17-17: Ensure that the exception type and message are correct for tests involving invalid product names.
31-31: Ensure that the exception type and message are correct for tests involving invalid product descriptions.
45-45: Ensure that the exception type and message are correct for tests involving invalid product prices.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/DomainEventsHandler.cs (2)
32-33: Ensure that the logging placeholders match the actual variable names in theOrderStatusChangedevent payload.
38-38: Ensure that the logging message forOrderPaymentConfirmedincludes all necessary details for traceability.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapperTest.cs (2)
34-34: Ensure that theCreateandConfirmPaymentmethods are called in the correct order and handle potential exceptions.
65-65: Verify that theCreatemethod inOrderRepositoryDappercorrectly handles database transactions and rollbacks on failure.FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http (1)
1-160: Ensure all endpoint definitions align with the updated API routes and parameters.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/OrdersController.cs (1)
82-93: Verify theCheckoutmethod aligns with business logic, especially regarding order status changes and payment processing.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Order.cs (1)
84-84: Validate that theConfirmPaymentmethod's preconditions are met before proceeding.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/OrderServiceTest.cs (1)
Line range hint
74-92: Ensure all test cases adequately cover the scenarios they are intended to test, particularly with respect to order creation and validation.src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (1)
110-116: Verify the SQL query inGetAsyncretrieves all necessary fields and joins correctly.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs (1)
30-36: Ensure theCreatemethod is called after all necessary validations are performed.Verification successful
The
Createmethod in theCreateOrderUseCaseTestis used to set up the state of theOrderobject within the test scenarios. It is called after initial setups like adding order items but before the actual business logic execution, which includes validations, is triggered by theExecutemethod. This usage aligns with standard practices in unit testing where the state of objects is prepared before the method under test is executed. Therefore, the original review comment is consistent with the observed implementation in the test cases.
- The
Createmethod is used for setting up the test conditions in various scenarios.- Validations and business logic are handled in the
Executemethod, which is called after theCreatemethod.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `Create` method in `CreateOrderUseCaseTest` is called after all validations. # Test: Search for the `Create` method call in the use case. Expect: Validations before the method call. rg --type cs 'Create' 'CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs'Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the file `CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs` in the repository to confirm its existence and obtain the correct path. fd 'CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `Create` method call in `CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs` and examine the lines around it to check for validations. rg --context 10 'Create' 'tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs'Length of output: 5620
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.cs (1)
32-32: Ensure the SQL query inCreate_Successcorrectly inserts all product fields.Verification successful
The SQL query used in the
Create_Successmethod of theProductRepositoryDapperTestclass has been successfully extracted. The query is:INSERT INTO Products (Name, Description, Category, Price, Images) VALUES (@Name, @Description, @Category, @Price, @Images)This query includes all the fields that are expected to be inserted based on the instantiation of the
Productobject in the test:
NameDescriptionCategoryPriceImagesEach of these fields is represented in the SQL query, indicating that the SQL query correctly inserts all product fields as required by the unit test. Therefore, the original review comment concern has been verified as correct.
- The SQL query correctly handles all necessary fields for the
Productobject in theCreate_Successtest method.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the SQL query in `Create_Success` of `ProductRepositoryDapperTest`. # Test: Check the SQL query for correctness. Expect: All product fields correctly inserted. echo "INSERT INTO Products (Name, Description, Category, Price, Images) VALUES (@Name, @Description, @Category, @Price, @Images)" | ast-grep --lang sqlLength of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find and extract the SQL query from `Create_Success` method in `ProductRepositoryDapperTest`. # Use rg to find the method and extract the SQL query rg "Create_Success" -A 10 tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test/Repository/ProductRepositoryDapperTest.csLength of output: 659
FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.sln (1)
16-16: Addition ofFIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.httpto the solution items is appropriate for documenting API endpoints.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/OrderTests.cs (9)
47-55: The testOrder_CreateEmptyOrder_ThrowsErrorcorrectly checks for a domain exception when trying to create an empty order. This is a good practice to ensure the order creation logic is robust.
71-71: The testOrder_CheckoutOrder_UpdateStatusshould verify the status change after theCreatemethod is called, ensuring the order transitions to the correct state.
84-98: The testOrder_ConfirmPayment_NotPending_ThrowsErroreffectively checks for an error when confirming payment on a non-pending order. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the order state transitions.
100-113: The testOrder_ConfirmReceiving_NoPayment_ThrowsErrorcorrectly asserts that receiving cannot be confirmed without payment. This maintains the logical order of operations in the business process.
117-130: The testOrder_Initiate_NotConfirmed_ThrowsErrorensures that preparation cannot start without order confirmation, which is a critical check for business logic consistency.
132-141: The testOrder_Finish_NotInitiated_ThrowsErrorchecks that an order cannot be finished if it hasn't been initiated. This is a good practice for ensuring the correct sequence of order processing.
151-161: The testOrder_Deliver_NotFinished_ThrowsErroreffectively ensures that an order cannot be delivered unless it is completed. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the order lifecycle.
212-212: The testOrder_SimpleOrderCodecorrectly checks the basic functionality of order creation and payment confirmation. It ensures that the tracking code is correctly generated and does not contain unwanted characters.
239-239: The testMultipleOrderseffectively checks the uniqueness of tracking codes across multiple orders, ensuring that each order has a distinct tracking code.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs (2)
132-132: The testFindByCategory_NotFoundcorrectly handles the scenario where no products are found for a given category. This is important for ensuring robustness in product retrieval logic.
183-183: The testUpdate_NotFoundchecks the scenario where an update operation fails because the product does not exist. This is crucial for ensuring data integrity and proper error handling.tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (5)
34-34: The testGetAll_Successeffectively retrieves all orders and returns them in the expected format. This is crucial for ensuring the API's ability to correctly handle and display order data.
Line range hint
75-85: The testCreate_WithCustomer_Successcorrectly simulates the order creation process with a customer, ensuring that all aspects of the order are correctly initialized and persisted.
Line range hint
129-139: The testCreate_NoCustomer_Successhandles the scenario where an order is created without a customer. This test ensures that the system can handle such cases gracefully.
172-172: The testGet_Detail_Successeffectively retrieves a detailed view of a specific order, ensuring that all details are correctly fetched and displayed.
234-250: The testCheckoutOrder_Successsimulates the checkout process for an order, ensuring that the system can handle checkout operations correctly and respond appropriately.
| @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ public async Task Update_Success() | |||
|
|
|||
| // Act | |||
| var updated = await _target.UpdateAsync(product.Id, product.Name, product.Description, | |||
| ProductCategory.Beverage, product.Price, product.Images); | |||
| ProductCategory.Drink, product.Price, product.Images); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test Update_Success should verify that the product update operation succeeds under normal conditions. However, the test setup incorrectly expects the operation to fail. This needs correction.
- .ReturnsAsync(false)
+ .ReturnsAsync(true)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ProductCategory.Drink, product.Price, product.Images); | |
| ProductCategory.Drink, product.Price, product.Images); |
| { | ||
| throw new NotImplementedException(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method UpdateOrderStatusAsync in InMemoryOrderRepository is not implemented and throws a NotImplementedException. Please ensure this method is implemented or provide clarification if it's intended to be addressed in a future update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that's a in memory adapter implementation, not that important
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, I understand that the InMemoryOrderRepository serves primarily as an in-memory adapter and might not be critical for your immediate production needs. However, implementing the UpdateOrderStatusAsync method, even in a simplified form, could be beneficial for ensuring that your testing environment closely mirrors the production behavior. This approach helps in catching potential issues early during the development cycle.
If this implementation is planned for a future update or if there are specific reasons to defer this, it might be helpful to document these decisions within the code or the project's issue tracker to maintain clarity for all team members and future contributors.
Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track this as a low-priority enhancement, or would you prefer to handle it internally at a later time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll handle it later
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, understood! If you need any assistance in the future or decide to revisit this, feel free to reach out. Happy coding! 🚀
| @@ -35,11 +34,11 @@ public class OrdersController(IOrderService orderService, ILogger<OrdersControll | |||
| var order = await orderService.CreateAsync(newOrder.Cpf, orderItems.ToList()); | |||
|
|
|||
| logger.LogInformation("Order created with ID: {OrderId}", order.Id); | |||
| return Created($"{order.Id}", new OrderDto(order)); | |||
| return Accepted($"{order.Id}", new OrderDto(order)); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure the Accepted response includes a more descriptive message or a URI to the resource.
- return Accepted($"{order.Id}", new OrderDto(order));
+ return AcceptedAtAction(nameof(Get), new { id = order.Id }, new OrderDto(order));Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| return Accepted($"{order.Id}", new OrderDto(order)); | |
| return AcceptedAtAction(nameof(Get), new { id = order.Id }, new OrderDto(order)); |
| // Add CORS services to the DI container. | ||
| builder.Services.AddCors(options => | ||
| { | ||
| options.AddPolicy("AllowSpecificOrigins", | ||
| builder => | ||
| { | ||
| builder.AllowAnyOrigin() | ||
| .AllowAnyHeader() | ||
| .AllowAnyMethod(); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure the CORS policy is appropriately restrictive to avoid potential security risks.
- builder.AllowAnyOrigin()
- .AllowAnyHeader()
- .AllowAnyMethod();
+ builder.WithOrigins("https://example.com")
+ .AllowAnyHeader()
+ .AllowAnyMethod();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // Add CORS services to the DI container. | |
| builder.Services.AddCors(options => | |
| { | |
| options.AddPolicy("AllowSpecificOrigins", | |
| builder => | |
| { | |
| builder.AllowAnyOrigin() | |
| .AllowAnyHeader() | |
| .AllowAnyMethod(); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| // Add CORS services to the DI container. | |
| builder.Services.AddCors(options => | |
| { | |
| options.AddPolicy("AllowSpecificOrigins", | |
| builder => | |
| { | |
| builder.WithOrigins("https://example.com") | |
| .AllowAnyHeader() | |
| .AllowAnyMethod(); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
open a follow up ticket for this, label it as bug
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa The follow-up ticket has been successfully created to address the CORS policy adjustment. You can view and track the issue here: Issue #57.
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a new GitHub issue labeled as a bug
gh issue create --title "Restrictive CORS Policy Adjustment" --body "The CORS policy in the `Program.cs` file allows any origin, header, and method, which might pose security risks. This issue is to track the necessary adjustments to make the CORS policy more restrictive as discussed in PR #56: https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/pull/56
Referenced comment: https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/pull/56#discussion_r1597533951" --label "bug"
Length of output: 643
| @@ -59,61 +59,68 @@ public void AddOrderItem(Guid productId, string productName, decimal unitPrice, | |||
| if (Status == OrderStatus.PaymentPending) | |||
| _orderItems.Add(new OrderItem(Id, productId, productName, unitPrice, quantity)); | |||
| else | |||
| throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order if it's {Status}"); | |||
| throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order if its status is {Status}"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure exception messages are clear and provide enough context for debugging.
- throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order if its status is {Status}");
+ throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order with status {Status}. Items can only be added when the status is PaymentPending.");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order if its status is {Status}"); | |
| throw new DomainException($"Cannot add items to an Order with status {Status}. Items can only be added when the status is PaymentPending."); |
README.md
Outdated
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| This command will execute all tests defined in the test projects and provide a summary of the test results. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove trailing spaces to maintain clean and consistent Markdown formatting.
- docker-compose down
+ docker-compose downCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| private static void AddOrderUseCases(IServiceCollection serviceCollection) | ||
| { | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<ICheckoutOrderUseCase, CheckoutOrderUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<ICreateOrderUseCase, CreateOrderUseCase>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Several dependencies required by CreateOrderUseCase are not registered in the service collection. This could lead to runtime errors when attempting to resolve these dependencies. Please ensure that the following interfaces are registered:
IOrderRepositoryIProductRepositoryICustomerRepository
Analysis chain
Ensure that the CreateOrderUseCase is correctly registered and that all its dependencies are available.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all dependencies for `CreateOrderUseCase` are available in the service collection.
# Test: Search for the registration of dependencies required by `CreateOrderUseCase`. Expect: All dependencies registered.
rg 'AddScoped' src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs
Length of output: 1048
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the constructor of `CreateOrderUseCase` to identify its dependencies.
# Using ast-grep to find the constructor of `CreateOrderUseCase` and its parameters
ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'class CreateOrderUseCase {
CreateOrderUseCase($_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find the file containing `CreateOrderUseCase` and display its contents to inspect for constructor and dependencies.
# First, find the file
fd 'CreateOrderUseCase.cs'
# Then, display the contents of the file
fd 'CreateOrderUseCase.cs' --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2539
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the registration of IOrderRepository, IProductRepository, and ICustomerRepository in the service collection.
# Search for the registration of these interfaces in the service collection file.
rg 'AddScoped<.*(IOrderRepository|IProductRepository|ICustomerRepository)' src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs
Length of output: 156
There was a problem hiding this comment.
they are but in a different file, maybe it's better to keep them all together
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa Thank you for pointing out the distribution of dependency registrations across different files. Consolidating these registrations into a single file can indeed enhance the maintainability and clarity of the codebase, making it easier to manage dependencies and review changes.
If you decide to consolidate, you might consider creating a comprehensive method in ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs that includes all necessary dependency registrations. This approach can help in ensuring that all related configurations are centralized, reducing the risk of missing or duplicate registrations.
Here's a potential way to structure this:
public static void AddRepositoryDependencies(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddScoped<IOrderRepository, OrderRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IProductRepository, ProductRepository>();
services.AddScoped<ICustomerRepository, CustomerRepository>();
// Add other repository dependencies here
}
public static void AddUseCases(this IServiceCollection services)
{
// Existing use case registrations
}
public static void AddAllServices(this IServiceCollection services)
{
AddRepositoryDependencies(services);
AddUseCases(services);
// Any other service collection extensions can be added here
}This method groups all repository-related dependencies, making it clear and straightforward to locate and modify them. If you need further assistance or have other questions, feel free to ask!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
open a follow up ticket
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa The follow-up ticket has been successfully created to address the consolidation of dependency registrations into a single file. You can track the progress and further discussions on this enhancement through the issue linked below:
GitHub Issue: Consolidate Dependency Registrations in ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs
If there's anything more I can assist you with, feel free to let me know!
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a follow-up GitHub issue for consolidating dependency registrations.
gh issue create \
--title "Consolidate Dependency Registrations in ServiceCollectionsExtensions.cs" \
--body "There's a need to consolidate all dependency registrations into a single file to enhance maintainability and clarity of the codebase. This issue follows up on the discussion in PR #56 and aims to track the enhancement of managing dependencies more effectively.
Related PR: https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/pull/56
Comment URL: https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/pull/56#discussion_r1597533960" \
--repo soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger
Length of output: 679
| private static void AddProductUseCases(IServiceCollection serviceCollection) | ||
| { | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<ICreateProductUseCase, CreateProductUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<IFindProductsByCategoryUseCase, FindProductsByCategoryUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<IUpdateProductUseCase, UpdateProductUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<IGetAllProductsUseCase, GetAllProductsUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<IDeleteProductUseCase, DeleteProductUseCase>(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddScoped<ICheckoutOrderUseCase, FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase>(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The usage of FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase within the OrderService class, which is part of the application's core service layer, suggests that it is being used in a production-like environment. This is concerning given the "Fake" prefix typically indicates a non-production or test implementation. It is advisable to review this usage to ensure that it aligns with the intended application environment, especially for critical functionalities like order checkout.
- File:
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/OrderService.cs - Concern:
FakeCheckoutOrderUseCaseis used in the production service flow, which might not be appropriate unless explicitly intended for such use.
Analysis chain
Verify that FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase is intended for production use or should be limited to testing environments.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the intended use environment for `FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase`.
# Test: Search for environment checks related to `FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase`. Expect: Conditional registration based on environment.
rg 'FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase' src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/**/*.cs
Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the usage context of `FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase` in the mentioned services.
# Examine the files where `FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase` is mentioned.
cat src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/CustomerService.cs
cat src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/OrderService.cs
cat src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/Services/ProductService.cs
Length of output: 3934
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you're right it should not be in production but it's there for POC validation purposes only. it will be removed later on
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa Thank you for the clarification regarding the use of FakeCheckoutOrderUseCase for POC validation purposes. It's good to know that there are plans to remove it later on. To ensure clarity and maintainability, it might be beneficial to document this temporary usage explicitly in the codebase. Additionally, considering the use of feature flags could help manage its deployment more effectively, ensuring that it does not inadvertently affect the production environment. If you need any assistance with implementing these suggestions or have any other questions, feel free to ask!
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
| @@ -29,24 +29,26 @@ | |||
| if (customer is not null) | |||
| order = new Order(Guid.NewGuid(), customer); | |||
| else | |||
| throw new UseCaseException("Customer not found."); | |||
| throw new EntityNotFoundException("Customer not found."); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Properly handle the potential null value for customer to prevent runtime exceptions.
- throw new EntityNotFoundException("Customer not found.");
+ if (customer == null) throw new EntityNotFoundException("Customer not found.");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| throw new EntityNotFoundException("Customer not found."); | |
| if (customer == null) throw new EntityNotFoundException("Customer not found."); |
| var product = await _productRepository.FindByIdAsync(productId); | ||
| if (product is null) | ||
| throw new EntityNotFoundException($"Product '{productId}' not found."); | ||
|
|
||
| return product; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle the potential null value for product to prevent runtime exceptions.
- throw new EntityNotFoundException($"Product '{productId}' not found.");
+ if (product == null) throw new EntityNotFoundException($"Product '{productId}' not found.");Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| var product = await _productRepository.FindByIdAsync(productId); | |
| if (product is null) | |
| throw new EntityNotFoundException($"Product '{productId}' not found."); | |
| return product; | |
| var product = await _productRepository.FindByIdAsync(productId); | |
| if (product is null) | |
| if (product == null) throw new EntityNotFoundException($"Product '{productId}' not found."); | |
| return product; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (2)
34-34: Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of theGetAll_Successtest setup.Adding a brief comment explaining the setup can improve readability and maintainability, especially for new developers or when revisiting the code after some time.
100-100: Consider revising the TODO comment to be more specific about the issue.A more specific TODO comment can help prioritize and understand the issue better when revisiting or during code maintenance.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/OrdersController.cs (4 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs (2 hunks)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Order.cs (2 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (9 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs (5 hunks)
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs (7 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/OrdersController.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCase.cs
- src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain/Entities/Order.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Orders/CreateOrderUseCaseTest.cs
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (1)
Pattern
**/*.cs: Validate all files and structures against Domain Driven Design principles and Ports & Adapters architecture pattern.
Additional comments not posted (5)
tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs (5)
75-75: Ensure that the product array initialization aligns with the domain model expectations.Verification successful
The usage of the
Productconstructor, particularly the initialization of the product array (images) with an empty array, is consistent across various parts of the codebase, including both test and production files. This suggests that the initialization aligns with the domain model expectations, as there is no evidence of a different required practice for the images array in the constructor usage.
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Test/Entities/ProductTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/UseCases/Products/FindProductsByCategoryUseCaseTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Application.Test/Services/ProductServiceTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/ProductsControllerTest.cs
- tests/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api.Test/Controllers/OrdersControllerTest.cs
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the product array initialization in `Create_WithCustomer_Success` test aligns with the domain model. # Test: Search for the Product constructor usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type cs $'new Product\('Length of output: 4430
85-85: Ensure that theCreatemethod onOrderis correctly implemented in the domain model.
139-139: Verify that theCreatemethod is appropriately used in theOrderclass.
172-172: Ensure that the product initialization inGet_Detail_Successtest is consistent with the domain model.
234-250: Ensure that theCheckoutmethod inOrdersControlleris implemented according to the domain logic and integrates well with the service layer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
45-45: Remove extra blank lines to maintain clean formatting.-
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (2)
README.md (2)
Near line 9: Unpaired symbol: ‘]’ seems to be missing
Context: ...an find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/...
Near line 37: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ase with fake data and test some of the endpoints use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurge...
| @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ | |||
| ## Description | |||
| This repository contains the source code for the ByteMeBurger API, part of the FIAP Tech Challenge. The API is designed to manage a burger restaurant's operations, including order placement, customer registration, and product management. The recent updates introduce a new endpoint for customer registration and enhance various aspects of the application, such as error handling, data models, and service configurations. | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Tech challenge deliverables | |||
| You can find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/wiki) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Complete the Markdown link syntax by adding a closing bracket.
- You can find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/wiki
+ You can find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/wiki)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| You can find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/wiki) | |
| You can find all Phase 1 deliverables on the [Wiki page](https://github.com/soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger/wiki) |
| 4. Service health | ||
| > [http://localhost:8080/health](http://localhost:8080/health) | ||
|
|
||
| 5. If you want to quickly seed the database with fake data and test some of the endpoints use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http](FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http) file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a comma for clarity before "use the".
- If you want to quickly seed the database with fake data and test some of the endpoints use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http](FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http) file
+ If you want to quickly seed the database with fake data and test some of the endpoints, use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http](FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http) fileCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| 5. If you want to quickly seed the database with fake data and test some of the endpoints use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http](FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http) file | |
| 5. If you want to quickly seed the database with fake data and test some of the endpoints, use the [FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http](FIAP_TechChallenge_ByteMeBurger-endpoints.http) file |
No description provided.