This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
Deal with misleading storage rewards in Inflation struct #10092
Milestone
Comments
Storage should also be removed from this calculation as well, correct? Line 69 in c600cfc
Right now, in epochs after the foundation term:
|
Yeah. Might need @ericlwilliams's help |
Hm, snapshot 1.3 should remove these fields at once, then? :) |
Yeah seems like that can/should be killed. Unless @aeyakovenko, or anyone else, sees Archivers on the horizon. For the foreseeable future, inflation should be divvied out just between validators and Foundation/Grant pools |
This was referenced Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This field is now dead code
solana/sdk/src/inflation.rs
Lines 21 to 22 in 58ef02f
as of #9992.
Removing it entirely would likely cause a snapshot ABI change, so renaming it to
__unused
would be an alternative. It should be removed from thegetInflation
RPC API AS wellThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: