-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
validator: skip health check #33568
validator: skip health check #33568
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #33568 +/- ##
=========================================
- Coverage 81.7% 81.7% -0.1%
=========================================
Files 807 807
Lines 218283 218287 +4
=========================================
- Hits 178485 178467 -18
- Misses 39798 39820 +22 |
b7faa48
to
36045c5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks
Hi @mvines, no chance for |
v1.17 seems fine to me, it's not really a critical bug fix so i don't feel like a v1.16 backport is appropriate, even though I appreciate this is a low risk change |
* validator: skip health check * keep `healthy` as a boolean (cherry picked from commit 7afb11f)
Problem
Issues with
getHealth
are known: #16957 And I believe that the issue will be fundamentally resolved.But right now, I'm concerned about updating the validator using
wait-for-restart-window
andexit
.There are already a lot of messages in the chats for 1.16.
I propose this tiny change that would allow bypassing the health check.
I sincerely hope for
v1.16
andv1.17
Summary of Changes
Added the
--skip-health-check
flag for thewait-for-restart-window
andexit
commandsFixes #33553