-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reorg Storage program to look more like the others #3448
Conversation
Hmm. we have a StorageState already in storage_stage... |
Yikes, StorageState with |
Sure. We can go with new names for those.. maybe SharedStorageStageState for outer and StorageStageState for what is the Inner one. |
But StorageState vs. StorageProgramState is a less precise name. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3448 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 79.3% 79.3% -0.1%
========================================
Files 154 156 +2
Lines 24191 24181 -10
========================================
- Hits 19206 19198 -8
+ Misses 4985 4983 -2 |
@sakridge, I agree StorageState isn't very precise as soon as its outside the storage program crate. I renamed it to StorageContract. What do you think? Better? Worse? |
@garious StorageContract is good. |
* Fixes test_load_transaction_accounts_program_account_executable_bypass. * Fixes test_load_transaction_accounts_data_sizes(). * Removes test_load_transaction_accounts_program_account_not_found_but_loaded().
Problem
Storage program has different file and naming conventions than the others.
Summary of Changes