Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate MAX_DATA_SHREDS_PER_FEC_BLOCK coding shreds for each FEC block #7474

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2019

Conversation

pgarg66
Copy link
Contributor

@pgarg66 pgarg66 commented Dec 13, 2019

Problem

FEC blocks with less number of data shreds do not contain enough coding shreds. The erasure recovery gets impacted due to this.

Summary of Changes

Generate MAX_DATA_SHREDS_PER_FEC_BLOCK coding shreds for each FEC block

Reference: #7428

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #7474 into master will increase coverage by <.1%.
The diff coverage is 85.7%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #7474     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage    73.1%   73.1%   +<.1%     
========================================
  Files         244     244             
  Lines       53843   53851      +8     
========================================
+ Hits        39389   39409     +20     
+ Misses      14454   14442     -12

@pgarg66 pgarg66 merged commit 7adc721 into solana-labs:master Dec 13, 2019
@pgarg66 pgarg66 deleted the issue7428 branch December 13, 2019 22:50
sagar-solana added a commit to sagar-solana/solana that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
solana-grimes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
… FEC block (#7474)" (#7898)

automerge

(cherry picked from commit 37d1daf)
solana-grimes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants