[subnet decap] Support decap rule generation based on T0 VIP route #3183
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Longxiang Lyu <lolv@microsoft.com>
bingwang-ms
previously approved these changes
Jun 4, 2024
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@lolyu The build is still failing after several retries. I suspect it's a code issue. |
bingwang-ms
previously approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
Signed-off-by: Longxiang Lyu <lolv@microsoft.com>
lolyu
force-pushed
the
subnet_decap_t0_vip
branch
from
778511c to
537232e
Compare
bingwang-ms
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
|
Tests already passed for this
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
Support dynamic decap rule generation based on the T0 VIP route.
Why I did it
To enable SONiC with the capability to decap IPinIP packets with dest IP as the VIP route received by T0.
How I verified it
VS test.
Details if related