Remove RIF from m_rifsToAdd before deleting it #3336
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
/azpw run |
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@tshalvi , possible to add unit test? |
dgsudharsan
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2024
|
any further request or this can be merged? |
|
/azpw run |
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run |
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azpw run |
|
/AzurePipelines run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
I extended the RIF removal functionality to also remove the port from the m_rifsToAdd list.
Why I did it
Typically, the counter and object handling logic follows a strict sequence:
Create an object, then start counter polling.
Stop counter polling, then remove the object.
However, there is deferred logic for RIF counters, where counter polling starts based on a timer rather than immediately.
This process generally works as follows:
If RIF creation and removal occur frequently, removal can happen before the timer event. As a result, the timer may start counter polling for an object that has just been removed, causing the following error message:
ERR syncd#SDK: :- processFlexCounterEvent: port VID oid:0x600000000099d, was not found (probably port was removed/splitted) and will remove from counters nowHow I verified it
Tested in regression.
Details if related