Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

admin: Also protect owner_account setting #1599

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2019
Merged

Conversation

dgw
Copy link
Member

@dgw dgw commented May 12, 2019

If I hadn't rushed 6.6.8 out, this would have been fixed already, but I was too quick to approve and merge #1587 and didn't realize there was another setting that needed protection until it was too late.

I'm sure there will be more little things to fix, so I'm not gonna rush this one out. Very few networks actually support the IRCv3 capabilities Sopel needs to authenticate accounts, so it's not urgent.

We still need a way for settings to declare themselves protected, or
private, so the `admin` module doesn't have to hard-code handling for
settings whose values shouldn't be displayed or changed on IRC.
@dgw dgw added Tweak Bugfix Generally, PRs that reference (and fix) one or more issue(s) labels May 12, 2019
@dgw dgw added this to the 6.6.9 milestone May 12, 2019
@dgw dgw requested a review from a team May 12, 2019 04:30
@dgw dgw changed the title admin: Protect owner_account setting, too admin: Also protect owner_account setting May 12, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@Exirel Exirel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 🔒

@dgw dgw merged commit 1d57408 into 6.6.x May 16, 2019
@dgw dgw deleted the set-protect-owner-account branch May 16, 2019 06:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bugfix Generally, PRs that reference (and fix) one or more issue(s) Tweak
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants