export plugin: hide all serverside-saving sections on MAST

[kecnry]

Description

This pull request uses the existing server_is_remote app-wide setting to hide the sections in the export plugin that would result in saving a file serverside (i.e. not through the file dialog).

To test: set server_is_remote=False in the config yaml file or set viz.plugins['Export']._obj.serverside_enabled=False.

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.73%. Comparing base (5c92eae) to head (5560972).
Report is 151 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3096   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.73%   88.73%           
=======================================
  Files         111      111           
  Lines       17271    17274    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        15325    15328    +3     
  Misses       1946     1946           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pllim]

There is conflict in change log.

Also probably need approval from @havok2063 ?

[kecnry]

There is conflict in change log

Yep, I'll rebase before merge (shouldn't hold up reviews though). I don't think we need a review from @havok2063 (although he's welcome to) - this is the same machinery we've used in the past and they already have implemented on their end.

[pllim]

Code looks like code. Thanks!

[bmorris3]

I reviewed this PR on Friday but didn't actually submit the review 🤦🏻‍♂️

This makes sense, thanks!