Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

footprints: filter by observatory #3345

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

kecnry
Copy link
Member

@kecnry kecnry commented Dec 10, 2024

Description

This pull request extends on #3322 by allowing to filter by mission (JWST or Roman) via buttons in the UI or the preset_obs select component in the API.

Screen.Recording.2024-12-10.at.11.12.44.AM.mov

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

@kecnry kecnry added this to the 4.1 milestone Dec 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations labels Dec 10, 2024
Comment on lines 915 to 920
@observe('filters')
def _update_items(self, msg={}):
all_items = [self._to_item(opt) for opt in self.manual_options]
self.items = [item for item in all_items if self._is_valid_item(item)]
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adding this to the base class then requires renaming all the inheriting classes to have their methods renamed so that they properly override this instead of resulting in duplicated functionality.

@kecnry kecnry force-pushed the wfi-footprint-filters branch from 82203ff to ceab93f Compare December 13, 2024 19:08
kecnry and others added 11 commits December 18, 2024 11:56
* manual options can be either strings or dictionaries
* filters passed to SelectPluginComponent will act on manual items, classes that subclass SelectPluginComponent may choose to ALWAYS include all manual items, ignoring filters
Co-authored-by: Jennifer Kotler <jkotler@stsci.edu>
@kecnry kecnry force-pushed the wfi-footprint-filters branch 7 times, most recently from c1b3878 to f135ad5 Compare December 18, 2024 18:42
@kecnry kecnry force-pushed the wfi-footprint-filters branch from f135ad5 to bfdeb50 Compare December 18, 2024 19:31
* manual options always last
* actually assign to correct select
@kecnry kecnry marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 20:15
@kecnry kecnry requested a review from rosteen as a code owner December 18, 2024 20:15
@kecnry
Copy link
Member Author

kecnry commented Dec 19, 2024

I'm stumped by these test failures (seems the remote data builds are failing to find the new icons for some reason), but will investigate. Reviews should be able to continue in the meantime - I expect the fix to be pretty minor as far as the diff is concerned.

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Dec 19, 2024

Are you sure we do not have to include them as package data?

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Dec 19, 2024

Maybe we need to add "data/*/*" here?

"jdaviz.configs.imviz.tests" = [

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Dec 19, 2024

p.s. I am really not sure. Can you reproduce this locally with remote data flag?

@kecnry kecnry force-pushed the wfi-footprint-filters branch from 6a4ac6d to 53dcc7d Compare December 19, 2024 17:10
@kecnry
Copy link
Member Author

kecnry commented Dec 19, 2024

may have just been a case issue, although no idea why that didn't complain locally or on the other tests 🤷‍♂️

@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Dec 19, 2024

Ah, okay! OSX (which is probably what you using) is case-insensitive but Linux is case-sensitive.

Comment on lines -293 to +298
subset = self.app.get_subsets(self.subset.selected)
try:
subset = self.app.get_subsets(self.subset.selected)
except Exception:
# subset invalid message will already be set,
# no need to set valid/invalid formats.
return
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is needed here because adding support for filtering the select dropdowns meant that this line was getting triggered and raising an exception. Without this PR, this traceback could still be triggered by going to the export plugin on an invalid subset (e.g., AND logic but not overlapping), but now it was being triggered in the test when importing the subset instead of when accessing it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically these aren't used, but I figure they might be useful at some point and don't really take much space. I can remove from here though if we'd rather wait until we need them?

Copy link
Collaborator

@rosteen rosteen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I like the icons. Might have to rethink those if we eventually support more predefined mission footprints but it's fine for now.

Copy link
Contributor

@bmorris3 bmorris3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This works great. I'm a little bummed how often we have to customize and call _update_items (formerly known as _update_layer_items), but hopefully it'll asymptotically converge.

Thanks again to @Jenneh too for the icons!

@kecnry kecnry merged commit 9663cf7 into spacetelescope:main Dec 20, 2024
23 checks passed
@kecnry kecnry deleted the wfi-footprint-filters branch December 20, 2024 17:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.21739% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.70%. Comparing base (297f8db) to head (53dcc7d).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...viz/configs/imviz/plugins/footprints/footprints.py 58.33% 10 Missing ⚠️
jdaviz/configs/default/plugins/export/export.py 68.75% 5 Missing ⚠️
jdaviz/core/template_mixin.py 97.01% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3345      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.76%   88.70%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines       19231    19291      +60     
==========================================
+ Hits        17071    17113      +42     
- Misses       2160     2178      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
imviz plugin Label for plugins common to multiple configurations Ready for final review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants