Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

romancal mosaic pipeline documentation issues #1365

Closed
stscijgbot-rstdms opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1396
Closed

romancal mosaic pipeline documentation issues #1365

stscijgbot-rstdms opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1396
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@stscijgbot-rstdms
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue RCAL-890 was created on JIRA by Samantha Hoffmann:

The mosaic level pipeline page on readthedocs (https://roman-pipeline.readthedocs.io/en/latest/roman/pipeline/mosaic_pipeline.html)) only briefly mentions the source catalog step in the table, and does not mention the flux step at all. Right now there's no documentation I could find that lets users know the flux step is part of the mosaic pipeline.

Additionally, the docstring for the mosaic pipeline class ([https://github.com/spacetelescope/romancal/blob/main/romancal/pipeline/mosaic_pipeline.py]) does not list source catalog or flux in the list of steps the pipeline runs.

(Side note: this is my first time attempting to create an issue for romancal documentation, so it's highly likely I have made a misstep somewhere. Information on how to file issues like this correctly is very welcome, thank you in advance for your patience!)

@stscijgbot-rstdms
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by David Davis on JIRA:

Moved this from scsb to rcal

@stscijgbot-rstdms stscijgbot-rstdms added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant