Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update citations #898

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

BradleySappington
Copy link
Collaborator

@BradleySappington BradleySappington commented Aug 2, 2024

Establishing a CITATIONS.cff file to be in line with citation best practices. If anyone is going to use the software for data, or for a reference in a repository or paper, then the credits for this software will be maintained in the CFF file (which gets pushed into the zenodo doi through our repository). So this will be used for giving credits for authors (in the exact versioning) for any papers/software where WebbPSF will be used.

@BradleySappington BradleySappington self-assigned this Aug 2, 2024
@BradleySappington BradleySappington marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 16:51
@BradleySappington
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added @Skyhawk172 and @mperrin myself. Couldn't find other orchids from contributors in our slack channel who are affiliated with Space Telescope Science Institute

@mperrin
Copy link
Collaborator

mperrin commented Aug 5, 2024

Let me ping here some other past contributors to webbpsf, in case any of them would like to also be included in the author list as recorded in the CITATIONS.cff file. If any of you excellent folks would like to also be included in that, can you please provide us here with your ORCID ID, etc?

@shanosborne @joseph-long @robelgeda @JarronL

@joseph-long
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the heads-up @mperrin ! My current employment details can be found here: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1905-9443

I think it would be a good idea to preserve the references to cite-able entities like SPIE proceedings (that this pull request removes) somewhere, either in the docs or the README. I have also seen a .bib file in the repo root used as a de-facto standard in the machine learning world, which I like because I already use BibTeX. (That could also contain the ASCL reference as a @misc.)

@shanosborne
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, yeah my id and info is all here: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8609-1518 - thanks!

@robelgeda
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for pinging us @mperrin !
My id is here:

  - given-names: Robel
    family-names: Geda
    affiliation: Princeton University
    orcid: 'https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9966'

@BradleySappington
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mperrin @obi-wan76 I think we are good to review/merge this is, we can update outliers in future PRs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mperrin mperrin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@mperrin mperrin merged commit 1afcd8e into spacetelescope:develop Aug 28, 2024
9 checks passed
@BradleySappington BradleySappington deleted the update_citations branch November 22, 2024 21:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants