-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attempted Ubuntu 20.04 - systemd 245 - Warning #517
Comments
Should I document the issue? |
Ubuntu ships a broken Ansible, but the bug isn't reported yet, the priority is to have it fixed upstream: Depending on how long it will take to get the maintainer to update Ansible to v2.9.8 or above, it could be a good idea to document this issue, especially since more and more people will opt for running 20.04LTS, all of them will run into this bug. |
I opened the issue on launchpad, here's the link If you have an ubuntu one account, you can mark yourself as affected. |
@pushytoxin This bug affects everyone who attempts to talk to a systemd 245+ distro. Ubuntu 20.04 might be a good start but it will affect everyone. |
Know of any other distros that ship systemd=245 together with ansible<2.9.7? Fedora is unaffected, and neither is debian (except buster-backports) |
Sorry, I just realized what you said. So this also affects people who use an older version of ansible to connect to a remote host with a newer systemd. I only ever used ansible on a localhost connection. |
Using the older one likely leads to issues like #517.
Indeed! This bug only affects people running outdated Ansible against a server with newish systemd (so far that's Archlinux and Ubuntu 20.04, it seems). Since Ansible has been fixed and there's been a new release since a long time ago, the proper solution seems to be to get it updated. Ubuntu is just very slow to do this. I remember a similar issue affecting us a few years back, where Ubuntu developers would just not update Ansible for months. A good workaround is to Use Ansible via Docker. Not sure if that would work with We may also update Seems like always using the workaround is a potential solution, but it's kind of ugly (very long output). It may be better to apply it for people who ask for it (perhaps |
you can just work around this issue by using the python3 version of ansible.
|
this issue was solved by ansible/ansible@bd4fdb1#diff-5fe2fdf32cea9df92893b26b933806b6ff6193d72e0774387459e2b7789f9189 worked for me on ubuntu 20.04 ansible 2.9 |
I've added some notes about this via 3fd198e |
Hi Everyone,
I am posting this issue as a warning. You have to update to
ansible 2.9.8+
for any distro withsystemd 245+
which includes Ubuntu 20.04, Fedora 32, etc.ansible/ansible@bd4fdb1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: