CNX-9441-ETABS-to-Revit-Scaling-Issue #3410
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
connorivy
changed the title
AlanRynne
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description & motivation
Conversation on forum (https://speckle.community/t/revit-etabs-connection-scaling-issue/9916/15) revealed that etabs units were not being retreived correctly when the units were a mix of metric and imperial. This is because we were using Model.GetPresentUnits() which returned the following enum
Clearly, there are no options corresponding to mixed unit values such as imperial length and metric temperature. Now, I have switched the database unit retrieval method to Model.GetPresentUnits_2() which separates the units individually.
Checklist:
References