π£ Mitigate chain of supply attacks
π Verify your curl scripts and executables
preflight
helps you verify scripts and executables to mitigate chain of supply attacks such as the recent Codecov hack.
First of all, it's the chicken and the egg. How do you pull a legit preflight
binary from us without verifying it with preflight
? having that preflight
is solving this exact problem?
The best way, is that you grab the source, compile it yourself, and use your own binary which you put in a place that you trust. People usually have several options of how to do that safely:
- Put it on your own S3 bucket
- Drop it on your own Artifactory or similar
- Push it directly into your repos (it should be as small as 4mb, and almost never change so, Git should work nicely with it)
- Build from source into your containers directly:
FROM golang:1.16-alpine AS preflight_builder
RUN apk add --no-cache git
WORKDIR /builds
RUN GOBIN=`pwd` go get -u github.com/spectralops/preflight
# Build from a bare image, copy built binary
FROM alpine:3.9
RUN apk add ca-certificates
COPY --from=preflight_builder /builds/preflight /usr/local/bin
# use preflight as you wish
RUN curl https://.. | preflight run <digest>
If you want to just get started quickly on your workstation, you can download a release or install preflight
with homebrew:
$ brew tap spectralops/tap && brew install preflight
Someone changed the script or binary you're running. Abort!
$ curl -L https://XXX | preflight run sha256=1ce...2244a6e86
βοΈ Preflight starting
β Preflight failed:
Digest does not match.
Expected:
<...>
Actual:
<...>
Information:
It is recommended to inspect the modified file contents.
A hash is verified, but it is actually vulnerable. Abort!
$ curl -L https://XXX | preflight run sha256=1ce...2244a6e86
βοΈ Preflight starting using file lookup: malshare.current.sha256.txt
β Preflight failed: Digest matches but marked as vulnerable.
Digest matches but marked as vulnerable.
Information:
Vulnerability: Hash was found in a vulnerable digest list
More: malshare.current.sha256.txt
All ok, let's fly.
$ curl -L https://XXX | preflight run sha256=1ce...2244a6e86
βοΈ Preflight starting
β
Preflight verified
... actual script output ...
You can install Preflight with a Github action, or use it like this:
- name: Setup Preflight
uses: spectralops/setup-preflight@v1
And now, you have a preflight
binary to play with.
First, let's create a hash (before creating it, review the script manually and see that it's not doing anything funny):
$ curl -s https://codecov.io/bash | ./preflight create
sha256=d6aa3207c4908d123bd8af62ec0538e3f2b9f257c3de62fad4e29cd3b59b41d9
Now, we're going to take
sha256=d6aa3207c4908d123bd8af62ec0538e3f2b9f257c3de62fad4e29cd3b59b41d9
And use this to secure our pulls from Codecov. In this case, preflight
is checked safely into your repo under ci/preflight
.
BEFORE (insecure):
steps:
- curl -s https://codecov.io/bash | sh
AFTER (safe, yay!):
steps:
- curl -s https://codecov.io/bash | ./ci/preflight run sha256=d6aa3207c4908d123bd8af62ec0538e3f2b9f257c3de62fad4e29cd3b59b41d9
It's recommended to use preflight
when you're building Docker images, and are installing via curl | sh
scripts that vendors give you.
Before:
FROM alpine:3.9
RUN apk add ca-certificates
RUN apk add curl coreutils
RUN cd /opt && curl -L https://istio.io/downloadIstio | ISTIO_VERSION=1.7.2 sh
After (securely building preflight from source + validating Istio with preflight):
FROM golang:1.16-alpine AS preflight_builder
RUN apk add --no-cache git
WORKDIR /builds
RUN GOBIN=`pwd` go get -u github.com/spectralops/preflight
# Build from a bare image, copy built binary
FROM alpine:3.9
RUN apk add ca-certificates
RUN apk add curl coreutils
COPY --from=preflight_builder /builds/preflight /usr/local/bin
# create a hash with:
# curl -L https://istio.io/downloadIstio | preflight create
RUN cd /opt && curl -L https://istio.io/downloadIstio | \
ISTIO_VERSION=1.7.2 \
preflight run sha256=e826fb57c6705cca0b6464edf4c1701d4bd5fd5879f5820fca78941c0a83ce64
Using preflight
we're also getting a nice confirmation badge during the build process:
... docker build log...
βοΈ Preflight starting
β
Preflight verified
Downloading istio-1.7.2 from https://github.com/istio/istio/releases/download/1.7.2/istio-1.7.2-linux-amd64.tar.gz ...
Istio 1.7.2 Download Complete!
When updating an old binary or script to a new updated version, there will be at least two (2) valid digests "live" and just replacing the single digest used will fail for the older runnable which may still be running somewhere.
$ preflight <hash list|https://url/to/hash-list>
To support updates and rolling/auto updates of scripts and binaries we basically need to validate against <old hash>
+ <new hash>
at all times, until everyone upgrades to the new script. Preflight validates against a list of hashes
or better, give it a live URL of valid hashes
and it will validate against it.
curl .. | ./ci/preflight run sha256=d6aa3207c4908d123bd8af62ec0538e3f2b9f257c3de62fad4e29cd3b59b41d9,sha256=<new hash>,...
Or to a live URL:
curl .. | ./ci/preflight run https://dl.example.com/hashes.txt
Use this when:
- Use multiple digests verbatim, when your runnables change often, but not too often
- Use a URL when your runnables change often. Remember to follow the chain of trust. This will now mean that:
- Your hash list URL is now a source of trust
- Visually: we're swapping the chain of trust like so
curl <foreign trust> | ./ci/preflight <own trust>
Piping:
$ curl -s https://example.com/some-script | preflight run sha256=d6aa3207c4<...>b4
Executables:
$ preflight run sha256=d6aa3207c4<...>b4 ./my-script.sh
Piping:
$ curl -s https://example.com/some-script | preflight check sha256=d6aa3207c4<...>b4 | sh
Not that preflight check
is built in a way that you could continue to pipe to the next process:
- If a check passes, the checked script or binary content will be dumped to
STDOUT
- If a check fails, you'll get an
exit(1)
, and an error message
Executables:
$ preflight check sha256=d6aa3207c4<...>b4 ./my-script.sh
In this case:
- If a check passes, you'll get an
exit(0)
and no output (so you can compose with other tooling) - If a check fails, you'll get an
exit(1)
and an error message
You can easily create new hashes with preflight
. The default is a SHA256 hash, but you could also create a sha256
, sha1
, and md5
hash.
$ preflight create test.sh
sha256=fe6d02cf15642ff8d5f61cad6d636a62fd46a5e5a49c06733fece838f5fa9d85
Though not recommended, you can create other kinds (weaker kinds) of hashes for legacy/compatibility reasons:
$ preflight create test.sh --digest md5
md5=cb62874fea06458b2b0cabf2322c9d55
preflight
comes with lookup providers, which is optional -- you can enable them by using environment variables:
You can download a daily list of malware signatures from malshare.com or any equivalent service. Here is a direct link to such a list.
Then:
- Set
PF_FILE_LOOKUP=./path/to/text/file
With this configured preflight
will search for all digest types in this file before approving.
Here is a full example for your CI, combining preflight
with Malshare:
env:
PF_FILE_LOOKUP: malshare.current.sha256.txt
steps:
- wget https://www.malshare.com/daily/malshare.current.sha256.txt
- curl https://... | preflight <sha>
Result:
$ PF_FILE_LOOKUP=malshare.current.sha256.txt preflight run fe6d02cf15642ff8d5f61cad6d636a62fd46a5e5a49c06733fece838f5fa9d85 test.sh
βοΈ Preflight starting using file lookup: malshare.current.sha256.txt
β Preflight failed: Digest matches but marked as vulnerable.
Information:
Vulnerability: Hash was found in a vulnerable digest list
More: malshare.current.sha256.txt
You can use the virus total community API access to lookup your hashes.
- Set
PF_VT_TOKEN=your-virustotal-api-key
With this configured preflight
will automatically create the VirusTotal lookup provider and validate digest with it.
Here is a full example for your CI, combining preflight
with VirusTotal:
env:
PF_VT_TOKEN: {{secrets.PF_VT_TOKEN}}
steps:
- curl https://... | preflight <sha>
Result:
$ PF_VT_TOKEN=xxx preflight check e86d4eb1e888bd625389f2e50644be67a6bdbd77ff3bceaaf182d45860b88d80 kx-leecher.exe
βοΈ Preflight starting using VirusTotal
β Preflight failed: Digest matches but marked as vulnerable.
Information:
Vulnerability: VirusTotal stats - malicious: 40, suspicious 0
More: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e86d4eb1e888bd625389f2e50644be67a6bdbd77ff3bceaaf182d45860b88d80/detection
We've established that a file lookup is universal and general enough to be useful to everyone. However, you might prefer your own vendor, or a service such as VirusTotal -- preflight
's architecture is pluggable and we're accepting pull requests.
To all Contributors - you make this happen, thanks!
Copyright (c) 2021 @jondot. See LICENSE for further details.