Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cancel acc on brake press #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2021
Merged

cancel acc on brake press #1

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2021

Conversation

ajw0
Copy link

@ajw0 ajw0 commented Mar 7, 2021

No description provided.

@spektor56 spektor56 merged commit d31eabc into spektor56:nidec Mar 7, 2021
eyezenheim referenced this pull request in eyezenheim/eyezenpilot Jul 21, 2021
spektor56 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
* update names + notes for MPC outputs

"current_curvature" is not the correct description of what the MPC is outputting in it's curvature_ego state.
The MPC is integrating it's free variable, curvature_rate, such that curvature[0] is actually the desired_curvature before any delay.
inversely: the curvature_rate_desired is the desired rate of change to the setpoint and not the actual curvature rate. 

If we were to set the initial curvature = measured curvature in the MPC initiation these names would be correct. 
This was possibly how it was initially set up but the nomenclature here is now confusing.

* more notes

* match

* Clarify #1
spektor56 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
* update names + notes for MPC outputs

"current_curvature" is not the correct description of what the MPC is outputting in it's curvature_ego state.
The MPC is integrating it's free variable, curvature_rate, such that curvature[0] is actually the desired_curvature before any delay.
inversely: the curvature_rate_desired is the desired rate of change to the setpoint and not the actual curvature rate. 

If we were to set the initial curvature = measured curvature in the MPC initiation these names would be correct. 
This was possibly how it was initially set up but the nomenclature here is now confusing.

* more notes

* match

* Clarify #1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants