Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Swapped vim-multiple-cursors #691

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2014
Merged

Swapped vim-multiple-cursors #691

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2014

Conversation

seyDoggy
Copy link
Contributor

Swapped out terryma/vim-multiple-cursors for the better supported fork from kristijanhusak/vim-multiple-cursors

spf13 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2014
Swapped vim-multiple-cursors
@spf13 spf13 merged commit b45996f into spf13:3.0 Nov 20, 2014
@ngaloppo
Copy link

Wouldn't we need to add the guards for NeoComplete as described here?
https://github.com/kristijanhusak/vim-multiple-cursors#info

@bronzehedwick
Copy link
Contributor

Good point @ngaloppo. Not sure if this will conflict with YouCompleteMe, but that might be worth looking into as well.

@seyDoggy
Copy link
Contributor Author

If we were to include those functions wouldn't it make sense to add full-on
support for neocomplete? As it is I still have to include it in my
.vimrc.bundles.local. I'd be game for full support.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014, 17:40 Chris DeLuca notifications@github.com wrote:

Good point @ngaloppo https://github.com/ngaloppo. Not sure if this will
conflict with YouCompleteMe, but that might be worth looking into as well.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#691 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants