-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tox. #68
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add tox. #68
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
With the "better" detection of tables I had to remove a test that was passing by chance: the test was ensuring we were finding errors in a table... and the table used in the test was so small it went undetected by the old check, so we were looking for errors in it. With the current detection of table we correctly identify the table as a table and stop searching in it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Btw, if tox
is added, shall also be used in CI so we keep them aligned?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done in #100.
There's some non-tox things added in this PR. If they're still needed, should this PR be rebased. or this closed and those bits split out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Split make sense to me...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw, how about trying tox-gh
see #112
No description provided.