Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support reading Argparse instances inside classes #60

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

laf0rge
Copy link

@laf0rge laf0rge commented Jul 31, 2024

So far, shphinxarg only has support for reading/importing Argparse instances from global variables/attributes within a module. However, there are use cases where Argparse is used inside classes of a module, not as a global variable. This is particularly the case for uses of 'argparse' in the context of CLI / REPL style user interfaces, such as for example those built using the 'cmd2' module.

This change introduces the ability to specify a path in ':func:' using the '.'-notation (e.g. 'PysimApp.bulk_script_parser').

Initial patch by: Harald Welte laforge@osmocom.org
Co-authored by: Vadim Yanitskiy fixeria@osmocom.org

This is a follow-up to #36 (comment)

So far, shphinxarg only has support for reading/importing Argparse
instances from global variables/attributes within a module.  However,
there are use cases where Argparse is used inside classes of a module,
not as a global variable.  This is particularly the case for uses
of 'argparse' in the context of CLI / REPL style user interfaces,
such as for example those built using the 'cmd2' module.

This change introduces the ability to specify a path in ':func:'
using the '.'-notation (e.g. 'PysimApp.bulk_script_parser').

Initial patch by: Harald Welte <laforge@osmocom.org>
Co-authored by: Vadim Yanitskiy <fixeria@osmocom.org>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant