-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update ctrDetect Binaries #2666
Conversation
Ah, that's weird. This actually downgraded ctrDetect, if I can trust the timestamps. The OS X version we were distributing was built a day after the OS X 10.11 version, and the Linux version we were distributing includes one file 10 days older but another file a year-and-a-half newer than M. Sdika's published version. Comparing timestampsRe-extract the ctrDetect binaries, old and new and for both platforms:
Compare dates:
I tried looking in the older(?) OS X version to see if that explains part of it, but it does not: what we have been distributing is neither. Comparing OS X contentsExtract binaries:
Compare hashes:
Do we have an idea where these binaries came from? |
736b24b
to
5e5d162
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
6cbe083
to
9d09785
Compare
Despite this downgrading the binaries, I want to merge it for consistency's sake -- particularly, so that the build scripts for #2668 can refer to upstream directly instead of us having to keep a weird pseudo-mirror that no one else has just of those. It turned out that all the inconsistencies above were just problems in #2642, that are fixed now, so whatever downgrade this is it doesn't change the numbers appreciably. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
9d09785
to
c49deeb
Compare
Codecov Report
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
I've cleaned up this PR a bit so that it is easier to understand, and I want to summarize the changes I made.
So, I discarded the 7 duplicate commits, then rebased the changes from that 1 commit onto master. |
Manually version bump ctrDetect to match upstream's distribution.
This should be a minor change. It is in preparation for better automating the build which will download from M. Sdika's upstream directly.
How The Packages Were Built
Follow https://github.com/neuropoly/spinalcordtoolbox/wiki/Compile-binaries -> https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/site7/en/ctrDetect ->
Unpack the old version, update ctrDetect, and repack:
Now do the Linux version:
Checksums: