Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propagate graphql url to installation scoped client #184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

dennisgranath
Copy link
Contributor

@dennisgranath dennisgranath commented Mar 20, 2024

This is needed if you want to use the installationScopedClient with graphql api method. Otherwise we get following exception "Graphql url is not set".

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.18%. Comparing base (27719e8) to head (371cb1f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #184      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.15%   76.18%   +0.02%     
  Complexity      313      313              
============================================
  Files            44       44              
  Lines          1057     1058       +1     
  Branches         44       44              
============================================
+ Hits            805      806       +1     
  Misses          227      227              
  Partials         25       25              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dennisgranath dennisgranath marked this pull request as ready for review March 20, 2024 10:44
@dennisgranath dennisgranath merged commit 8947561 into master Mar 20, 2024
5 checks passed
@dennisgranath dennisgranath deleted the fixes-for-raw-graphql branch March 20, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants