Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Java 17 #2465

Closed
mp911de opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Upgrade to Java 17 #2465

mp911de opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Sep 20, 2021

No description provided.

@mp911de mp911de added the type: task A general task label Sep 20, 2021
@mp911de mp911de self-assigned this Sep 20, 2021
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.x milestone Sep 20, 2021
@mp911de mp911de closed this as completed Sep 20, 2021
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2021
Fix invalid links. Replace Javadoc links to JSR-305 with code annotations.

Replace self-enclosing tags with simple ones.

See #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2021
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2021
Use var instead of explicit local types where applicable. Use pattern variable instead instanceof and cast. Prefer loops and nullable types over Stream and Optional. Convert classes to records where applicable.

See #2465
christophstrobl pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2021
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
christophstrobl pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2021
Use var instead of explicit local types where applicable. Use pattern variable instead instanceof and cast. Prefer loops and nullable types over Stream and Optional. Convert classes to records where applicable.

See #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2021
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2021
Use var instead of explicit local types where applicable. Use pattern variable instead instanceof and cast. Prefer loops and nullable types over Stream and Optional. Convert classes to records where applicable.

See #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2022
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2022
Use var instead of explicit local types where applicable. Use pattern variable instead instanceof and cast. Prefer loops and nullable types over Stream and Optional. Convert classes to records where applicable.

See #2465
schauder pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2022
Avoid usage of encapsulated tests as dummies. Add dependency override for ASM dependencies.

Use Java 17 in CI pipeline.

Closes #2465
schauder pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2022
Use var instead of explicit local types where applicable. Use pattern variable instead instanceof and cast. Prefer loops and nullable types over Stream and Optional. Convert classes to records where applicable.

See #2465
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2022
We now reinstate local variable types instead of var as general var usage removes contextual detail that cannot be omitted generally.

See #2465
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant