Skip to content
Kam edited this page Mar 20, 2023 · 32 revisions

Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem

Please enable MathJax Plugin for Github or similiar to view $\LaTeX$.

Introduction

When trying to find the motion of a comet (mass $m_3$) in the three-body system including the Earth and the Sun (masses $m_2$ and $m_1$ respectively), the mass of the comet is much smaller than the other two; i.e., $ m _3 \ll m _2 < m _1 $. Because of this the 3-body problem is a restricted 3 body problem; furthermore, since the two larger masses rotate about a common center of mass this case is called a circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP).

     If the comet's position is $\vec{r}$ then the total force exerted on it is, \begin{equation} \vec{F} = - \frac{Gm_2m_3}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}_2|^3}(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_2) - \frac{Gm_1m_3}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r}_1|^3}(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_1) \label{force} \end{equation} where $\vec{r}_1$ and $\vec{r}_2$ are the positions of $m_1$ and $m_2$ respectively. Equation \eqref{force} is the basis of the CR3BP; that being said, this problem will be much easier to solve if it is normalized and generalized. I will take an almost purely mathematical approach to this, which will in return help with finding the Lagrange points and hence the stationary orbits.

Normalizing the Problem

To normalize the problem start by redefining the distance between the primary masses, \begin{equation} \left| r_1 - r_2 \right| \equiv 1 \end{equation}

Since I am normalizing a problem which includes the concept of barycenter, it would only make sense to redefine the small primary mass (in this case the Earth) such that $ 0 < m_2 < 1 $. \begin{equation} m_2\ \longrightarrow\ \frac{m_2}{m_1+m_2} \label{mu} \end{equation} Simplifying things further, \begin{align} &m_2 = \mu \label{m2} \\\ &m_1 = 1 - \mu \label{m1} \end{align} so with these new masses I now have a normalized relationship between the two bodies; \begin{equation} m_2 + m_1 = 1 \end{equation}

     To accommodate for the stationary configurations—the two primary large masses have fixed positions in a co-rotating frame with the origin at the center of mass. To do this first consider the derived formula for angular velocity $\Omega$ from Kepler's third law [2]; \begin{equation} \Omega = \frac{G(m_2 + m_1)}{r^3_{12}} \label{kepler} \end{equation} where $r_{12}$ is the distance between the two primary masses. Now that I am working in a non-inertial frame of reference, I know that for uniform circular motion the acceleration is, \begin{equation} a=\frac{v^2}{r}={\Omega^2r} \end{equation} but since it is a rotating frame, the velocity changes by $\Delta v$ at each rotation. Therefore, \begin{align} a &= \frac{(v+\Delta v)^2}{r} \\\ &= \frac{\Omega^2 r^2 + 2\Omega r\Delta v + \Delta v^2}{r} \\\ &= \Omega^2 r + 2\Omega \Delta v + {\frac{\Delta v^2}{r}} \label{line1} \\\ &\simeq \Omega^2 r + 2\Omega \Delta v \end{align} where the last term in line \eqref{line1} has been ignored because it is small relative to the other two terms.

     Furthermore, in the current defined frame of reference the following are the distances squared between the smaller mass $m_3$ and the larger masses $m_1$ and $m_2$ respectively. \begin{align} &r_1^2 = (x+\mu)^2+y^2 \\\ &r_2^2 = (x-1+\mu)^2+y^2 \end{align} Now I will rewrite equation \eqref{force}, \begin{align} &\ddot{x} -2\Omega\dot{y}-\Omega^2 x = -G\frac{m_2}{r_2^3}(x-1+\mu)- G\frac{m_1}{r_1^3}(x+\mu) \\\ &\ddot{y} -2\Omega\dot{x}-\Omega^2 y = -G\frac{m_2}{r_2^3}y- G\frac{m_1}{r_1^3}y \end{align} where I have broken up $\vec{r}$ into its Cartesian coordinates $(x,y)$. To finalize the normalization of \eqref{force} I set $G=1=\Omega$. I also substitute $m_1$ and $m_2$ in the above equations with the expressions in lines \eqref{m1} and \eqref{m2} respectively. \begin{align} &\ddot{x} -2\dot{y}- x = -\frac{\mu(x-1+\mu)}{r_2^3}- \frac{(1-\mu)(x+\mu)}{r_1^3} \label{av1}\\\ %%%%%%%%%%%% &\ddot{y} -2\dot{x}- y = -\frac{\mu y}{r_2^3}- \frac{(1-\mu)y}{r_1^3} \label{av2} \end{align}

Lagrange Points

Since I am trying to solve for the stationary configurations, the velocity and acceleration are assumed to be zero. This simplifies equations \eqref{av1} and \eqref{av2} to the following, \begin{align} &x = \frac{\mu(x-1+\mu)}{r_2^3}+ \frac{(1-\mu)(x+\mu)}{r_1^3} \label{l123}\\\ %%%%%%%%%%%% &y = \frac{\mu y}{r_2^3}+ \frac{(1-\mu)y}{r_1^3} \end{align}

The first three Lagrange points lie on the same line connecting $m_1$ and $m_2$, so their $y$ components are zero. Their $x$ components are found by solving equation \eqref{l123} using a computer algebra system. These points are: \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} L_1 = (+0.9900271,\ 0) \\
L_2 = (+1.0100336,\ 0) \\
L_3 = (-1.0000013,\ 0) \end{cases} \end{equation*} note that from \eqref{mu} $\mu$ is found to be $\dfrac{R_{\oplus}}{R_{\oplus}+R_{\odot}}\approx3.003\times10^{-6}$.

     The stable Lagrange points $L_4$ and $L_5$ can be obtained by remembering that they are the third vertices of equilateral triangles, the other two being the $m_1$ and $m_2$. The points are, \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} L_4 = (0.5-\mu,\ +\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}) \\
L_5 = (0.5-\mu,\ -\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}) \end{cases} \end{equation*}

RK4 Method

To use the results found above in order to find the two-dimensional motion of the comet $m_3$, I will utilize the Runge–Kutta method (RK4). The equations of motion for the RK4 are, \begin{align} &v_x = \dot{x} \\
&v_y = \dot{y} \\
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% &\dot{v}_x = -\frac{\mu(x-1+\mu)}{r_2^3}- \frac{(1-\mu)(x+\mu)}{r_1^3} + 2{v}_y + x \\
%%%%%%%%%% &\dot{v}_y = -\frac{\mu y}{r_2^3}- \frac{(1-\mu)y}{r_1^3} + 2v_x+y \end{align}

Bibliography

     [1] Lagrange Point (2020), Wikipedia, retrieved on 10/01/2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point.
     [2] Nkosi N. Trim, Visualizing Solutions of the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem, Rutgers University, 2008.

Clone this wiki locally