-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to dagger 2.50 #830
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
317786d
Update dagger + force later guava version in tests
ZacSweers d860543
Generate new Dagger createFactoryProvider functions
ZacSweers d49ce38
Formatting
ZacSweers dc7f458
Prohibit extension functions for @Binds
ZacSweers 50060e9
Validate providers too
ZacSweers eabb340
Update dependency guard
ZacSweers 2aab20e
Merge branch 'main' into z/dagger250
ZacSweers e380f5b
Merge branch 'main' into z/dagger250
ZacSweers 8394af8
Fix bad merge
ZacSweers a968f00
Merge branch 'main' into z/dagger250
ZacSweers e1395b6
Update classpaths
ZacSweers e20667c
Disable KspComponentProcessor in KSP tests
ZacSweers acef15f
slightly different messages
ZacSweers 22d8373
Merge branch 'main' into z/dagger250
ZacSweers 32e33ca
Merge branch 'main' into z/dagger250
JoelWilcox File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does Dagger always generate both now? Or are they keying off anything to decide on one vs the other? Looks like all the tests passed so it should be fine, but it feels a little surprising
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It always generates both now. The original for backward compatibility, the new one for forward compatibility. They're going to support both going forward