-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add signer-key
to *-increase
pox events
#4417
Comments
signer-key
to *-increase` pox eventssigner-key
to *-increase
pox events
After looking at |
Linking discussion: #4424 |
Discussing w/ ClarityWG it seems like the best / most practical solution here is to limit 'stack-increase' to users that are not straddling two signer-keys between upcoming cycles (aka they did not 'stack-extend' recently). That way every check is straight-forward with every iteration just checking that the existing signer-key is equal to the signer-key in the param. |
Yep, I think that's the right approach and aligns with @kantai 's comments on expected behavior |
Did work over the weekend on this that can be found here: feat/signer-key-amount-auth...feat/signer-key-amount-auth-stack-increase Reviewed with @hstove who'll 'git cherry-pick' commits into his main PR found here: #4461 I'll close issue once the PR linked above is merged-in. |
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
The
signer-key
has effectively become the “primary key” for all signer data. So if I’m trying to lookup information about stackers based onsigner-key
, it gets pretty difficult when important events likestack-increase
and associated events don’t include it.Based on discussion with @kantai, it doesn't sound possible to add a
map
that could be used to lookup thesigner-key
during synthetic event generation for these functions. Another approach would be to just add the signer key and signature args to the functions. It sounds like this might be a good idea to do anyway -- from Aaron:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: