Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Many tests broken on Windows #592

Closed
seantalts opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Many tests broken on Windows #592

seantalts opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@seantalts
Copy link
Member

Summary:

I was finally getting around to making Jenkins run the CmdStan tests on Windows as well (on @sakrejda's suggestion) and found that actually CmdStan tests are mostly broken on windows:

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 16 tests from 1 test case ran. (508 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
[ FAILED ] 15 tests, listed below:
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.printReallyPrints
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.refresh_zero_ok
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.refresh_nonzero_ok
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.zero_init_value_fail
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.zero_init_domain_fail
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.user_init_value_fail
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.user_init_domain_fail
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.CheckCommand_default
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.CheckCommand_help
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.CheckCommand_unrecognized_argument
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.timing_info
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.run_info
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.random_seed_default
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.random_seed_specified_same
[ FAILED ] StanUiCommand.random_seed_specified_different

You can see more info in a log here: http://d1m1s1b1.stat.columbia.edu:8080/job/CmdStan/job/PR-591/17/execution/node/57/log/ but I also verified on the Windows machine manually.

Current Version:

v2.17.0

@seantalts seantalts added this to the 2.17.0++ milestone Dec 12, 2017
@syclik
Copy link
Member

syclik commented Dec 12, 2017 via email

@seantalts
Copy link
Member Author

seantalts commented Dec 12, 2017

Woops, I think it was on your suggestion that I did the above, my bad. Gmail tends to get the authors wrong in the emails from git/discourse and it slipped by me.

@syclik syclik self-assigned this Dec 13, 2017
@syclik
Copy link
Member

syclik commented Dec 13, 2017

No worries... credit doesn't really matter for suggesting things. Doing them matters.

(I didn't really want to suggest it -- I don't like making work for other people.)

@seantalts
Copy link
Member Author

✋ thanks again! happy this is all working now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants