Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #158: support empty Projection clause, validate non-empty #284

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

tatu-at-datastax
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does:

Will add baseline dummy checking of "projection" clause, as pre-cursor for actual Projection implementation.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #158

Checklist

  • Changes manually tested
  • Automated Tests added/updated
  • Documentation added/updated
  • CLA Signed: DataStax CLA

@tatu-at-datastax tatu-at-datastax self-assigned this Mar 22, 2023
@tatu-at-datastax
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need to rethink aspects, due to concurrent, refactoring; closing and creating new PR.

@tatu-at-datastax tatu-at-datastax changed the title (WIP) Fix #158: support empty Projection clause, validate non-empty Fix #158: support empty Projection clause, validate non-empty Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support missing or empty projection clause for commands
1 participant