-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 985
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[#18934] universal scanner in wallet receive #19409
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fa5da2a
Fix linear-gradient breaking when `customization-color` is unknown
ulisesmac b3a6b4b
Fix exception while scanning an address due to non-existing navigatio…
ulisesmac 91efaa8
Small refactor
ulisesmac f33d3b8
Dispatches universal QR code scanner on share address modal
ulisesmac b68e76d
Fix screen keyword
ulisesmac File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better to use
string/blank?
to check for string emptiness.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just refactored this code to remove the unnecessary
:<>
there.But I agree, I'll update it, to improve the whole piece of code 👍 thanks for spotting it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ibrkhalil
I checked the implementation, and I'd prefer keep it as is since it's a bit complex, it's not just about checking a string.
the component receives:
time-frame
,time-frame-string
andtime-frame-to-string
.then it shadows
time-frame-string
with(time-string time-frame time-frame-string)
and sometimes
time-frame-string
will take the value of the receivedtime-frame-string
, so I guess the decision to useseq
was because it's more general.Since it's a bit hard to track all the flow to make sure this won't create a bug in some cases, I'd prefer to keep it as is, additionally, the
seq
is being used in a translation string, so it won't be""
or" "
.