Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add toLocaleString method to array/complex128 #2252

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2024
Merged

feat: add toLocaleString method to array/complex128 #2252

merged 2 commits into from
May 21, 2024

Conversation

Jaysukh-409
Copy link
Member

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Adds the typed array toLocaleString method to prototype of Complex128Array

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@kgryte kgryte added the Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. label May 21, 2024
kgryte
kgryte approved these changes May 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks, @Jaysukh-409!

@kgryte kgryte merged commit 9dfd026 into stdlib-js:develop May 21, 2024
8 checks passed
@kgryte kgryte deleted the toLocaleString128 branch May 21, 2024 19:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kgryte kgryte kgryte approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Jaysukh-409 @kgryte